nodamselindistress
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2020
- Messages
- 2,416
- Reaction score
- 26,132
Sounds more like AB was abusing DB!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then again he has the abused woman pattern that she returns to her abuser over and over.All the various unfounded accusations AB made about DB and the fact that she actually left him seem to go against what ferris is saying about what victims of DV actually do unless I'm mistaken.
lolSounds more like AB was abusing DB!
Hoping they have a dynamite rebuttal coming up! I am often sitting here with my mouth open when the prosecutor says "no more questions".Anyone else see the prosecutor's cross and beyond concerning?
The state best have an over the top "power point" closing that addresses all of AB's deceptive, manipulating and lying behavior throughout her marriage with DB.
Ferris had all the abused woman lingo down to a science yet it doesn't address the circumstances surrounding why AB claims she shot DB to death.
Chauvin put on head phones when there was a sidebar.Another thing, why is Ashley permitted to listen in on the attorneys and judge at sidebar? I do not recall having seen that in other trials.
imo:So what he said is it's ok to murder someone because in your mind you think they might harm you?
How so?The SC Restraining Order is a red herring...it was a MUTUAL restraining order requiring both parties to stay away from each other.
They seem adamant on proving Ashley could not and was not ever a victim of any abuse; rather than focusing on why this jury should find her guilty.Anyone else see the prosecutor's cross as beyond concerning?
Curious who came up with this Einstein of an idea and how long before they changed their minds.Brought out on cross of AB, she admitted the SC Restraining Order was for both her and Doug, not just her against Doug