FL - Former President Donald Trump indicted, 40 counts, classified documents and obstruction of justice, June 2023, Trial May 2024 #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I shall go ahead [after ALL my hard work] & post this - so I can shorten it up a bit when I put this in my "done" pile...

Monday, July 15th:
*Case Dismissed! (@ am ET) - FL – *Donald John Trump (76/now 78) indicted (6/8/23), charged & arraigned (6/13/23) with 31 counts of willful retention of classified documents, 1 count of conspiracy to obstruct justice, 1 count of withholding a document or record, 1 count of corruptly concealing a document or record, 1 count of concealing a document in a federal investigation, 1 count of scheme to conceal & 2 counts of making false statements & representations. Plead not guilty.
Additional indicted & charged (7/27/23) with 1 count of willful retention of defense information & 2 counts of obstruction. Plead not guilty in filing of waiver of non appearance & released on own recognizance with no monetary bond (Personal Surety Bond) & no travel restrictions (8/4/23). Southern District of Florida (Miami) Federal Court 9:23-cr-80101-AMC / 23-80101-CR-CANNON-REINHART
Count 1-31: Willful retention of National Defense info, Count 32: Conspiracy to obstruct justice, Count 33: Withholding a document or record, Count 34: Corruptly concealing a document or record, Count 35: Concealing a document in a Federal investigation, Count 36: Scheme to conceal & Count 37: False statements & representations.
Co-Conspirator *Waltine Nauta (41 or 42) indicted (6/8/23) & charged (6/13/23) on 6 charges stemming from special counsel Jack Smith’s classified documents probe, including conspiracy to obstruct justice, withholding a document or record, corruptly concealing a document or record, concealing a document in a federal investigation, scheming to conceal & making false statements to federal agents. Plead not guilty.
Additional indicted & charged (7/27/23) with 2 counts of obstruction of justice. No plea entered & released on his own recognizance with no monetary bond (Person Surety Bond).
Count 32: Conspiracy to obstruct justice, Count 33: Withholding a document or record, Count 34: Corruptly concealing a document or record, Count 35: Concealing a document in a Federal investigation, Count 36: Scheme to conceal & Count 38: False statements & representations.
Co-Conspirator *Carlos de Oliveira (56) has also been indicted & charged (7/27/23) with 1 count each of obstruction of justice, concealing records & documents & 1 count of making false statements to FBI. He is alleged to have asked what could be done to delete the footage. Plead not guilty (8/15/23). $100K Surety bond-out on bond. Judge ruled that, in the meantime, De Oliveira must hand in his expired U.S. passport within 48 hours.
Mr. Nauta & Mr. de Oliveira conspired to delete footage from security cameras after the Dept. of Justice issued a subpoena asking for surveillance footage of the basement where it said confidential documents were held. In the court documents, Mr. de Oliveira is claimed to have texted another employee who was the director of information technology that "the boss" wanted the server deleted. The documents allege that Mr. de Oliveira later met with the employee in a small IT room, told him their conversation should remain private, then pressured the man into obliging his request after the employee told Mr. de Oliveira that he did not have the authority.
Indictment: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.3.0.pdf
Trial was set to begin on 5/20/24 with Jury Selection has been put on Hold. Govt’’s Proposed trial date 7/8/24. Defense’s Proposed trial date 8/12/84 (for Trump & De Oliveira). And Proposed trial date 9/9/24 (for Nauta). (trial expected to take 2 weeks). Trial will be on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays & Fridays.

Case & court info from 4/2/23 thru 6/23/24 reference post #608 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...ice-june-2023-trial-may-2024-2.686530/page-31

6/24/24 Docket update: [641] Paperless ORDER: In accordance with the Court's prior Order [605], the hearing scheduled for 6/25/24, related to Defendant Trump's "Motion for Relief Relating to the Mar-a-Lago Raid & Unlawful Piercing of the Attorney-Client Privilege" [566] will commence in sealed session at 11am to protect materials as to which grand jury secrecy applies and/or as to which Defendant Trump asserts attorney-client privilege and/or work product protection. The hearing will resume in public fashion at approximately 1pm or as soon as otherwise practicable. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/24/24. [642] Government Exhibits 1 & 2. [643] Paperless ORDER & Minute Entry for Hearings held before Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/24/24. The Court heard argument on (1) Defendant Trump's Motion to Dismiss the Indictment Based on the Unlawful Funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith [326] & (2) the Special Counsel's Motion for Modification of Conditions of Release [592]. Special Counsel admitted exhibits without objection [642]. Consistent with the instructions provided in open court, the evidentiary record on this Motion will be open until 6/26/24, for the parties to file any additional evidentiary attachments/exhibits in support of, or in opposition to, the Motion [592]. Any attachments/exhibits shall be docketed as a "Notice of Filing" (separated by exhibits) & limited to specific evidentiary submissions only. No additional briefing will be permitted. Total time in court: 4 hours. Attorney Appearances: James Pearce, Jay I. Bratt, David Harbach, Todd Blanche, Emil Bove, Lazaro Fields, Kendra Wharton, Stanley Woodward, Sasha Dadan, Larry Donald Murrell, Jr. & John S. Irving. Court Reporter: Laura Melton. [644] Memorandum in Opposition by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira re [612] Motion to Dismiss [85] Indictment, based on Spoliation of Evidence in Violation of Due Process Replies due by 7/1/24. Exhibit 1-17.
6/20/24 Docket update: [645] Brief In Support of Good Lawgic, LLC's Motion Seeking Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice & to File Amicus Curiae Brief by Good Lawgic, LLC's. Responses due by 7/8/24.
6/25/24 Docket update: [646] Paperless ORDER denying [645] Motion Seeking Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice & to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Opposition to Special Counsel's Motion to Modify Conditions of Release [592]. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/25/24.
6/25/24 Update: Heard arguments on Defendant Trump's Motion for Relief Related to Mar-A-Lago Raid & Unlawful Piercing of Attorney-Client Privilege [566]. New photos have shown the extent of the "clutter" faced by FBI agents, who were forced to search the building in "filter teams" to avoid accidentally viewing top-secret material. The newly revealed photos were included as part of a filing in the federal court case, a response by special counsel Jack Smith in the wake of Mr Trump's efforts to suppress all evidence. Trump has accused agents of moving the order of documents found inside each box. The latest filing called the accusation "merit-less". "Trump personally chose to keep documents containing some of the most highly guarded secrets in cardboard boxes along with a collection of other personally chosen keepsakes of various sizes & shapes from his presidency," the prosecution said. "Newspapers, thank you notes, Christmas ornaments, magazines, clothing & photographs of himself & others. "[Here] the boxes travelled from one readily accessible location to another — a public ballroom, an office space, a bathroom, and a basement storage room. Each room had to first be searched by the Filter Team — dubbed the "Privilege Review Team" in the search warrant. This team would search for "any potentially attorney-client privileged material" so the "Case Team", made up of agents investigating the case, would not be exposed. "If the Filter Team came across any potentially privileged materials, the entire box … was to be segregated away from access by any member of the Case Team," the prosecution said. "[It would be] set aside for later, more thorough inspection by filter agents in the Washington Field Office." If a box was cleared by the Filter Team, it would go back to the Case Team, who would then search it for classified material. During the search, still more agents & an Evidence Response Team set up a workspace to sift through boxes cleared by the Filter Team. Classified documents were "removed" & "segregated", and "replaced with a placeholder sheet" showing where they had been removed. Ultimately, 15 boxes of records were retrieved from Mar-a-Lago, according to the US National Archives. By law, all administration records are required to be handed over to the Archives at the end of a presidency. The mishandled documents case has been indefinitely postponed due to pending pretrial motions & requests by Trump & his co-accused to dismiss the charges.
6/26/24 Update: The Court hereby cancels the partial evidentiary, multi-day hearing on Defendants' Motions to Compel [469] previously scheduled for 6/24-26/24, to be reset by subsequent Order. Defendants are ot required to appear at the June 2024 hearings.
6/26/24 Docket updates: [647] Transcript of Motions as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira held on 6/21/24 before Judge Aileen M. Cannon, 1-197 pages, Court Reporter: Laura Melton, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/17/24. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/29/24. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/24/24. [648] Transcript of Motions - morning session as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira held on 6/24/24 before Judge Aileen M. Cannon, 1-90 pages, Court Reporter: Laura Melton. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/17/24. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/29/24. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/24/24. [649] Transcript of Motions - afternoon session as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira held on 6/24/24 before Judge Aileen M. Cannon, 1-77 pages, Court Reporter: Laura Melton. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/17/24. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/29/24. Release of Transcript Restriction set for [650] Transcript of Motions - afternoon session as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira held on 6/25/24 before Judge Aileen M. Cannon, 1-81 pages, Court Reporter: Laura Melton. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/17/24. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/29/24. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/24/24. [651] Notice of Filing in Opposition to Motion 592 by Trump. Exhibits 1-11. [652] Notice of Filing by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira re [638] Reply to Response, [592] Motion to Modify Conditions of Release. Exhibits 1-11.
6/27/24 Docket update: System Entry-Docket Entry 653 restricted/sealed until further notice. [654] Government's Opposition to Request for Response by USA as to Trump. [655] Order Denying Motion for Franks Hearing & Reserving Ruling on Balance of Motion Pending Necessary Factual Development [566]. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/27/24. [656] Paperless Entry for Hearing held before Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/25/24. The Court heard argument on Defendant Trump's "Motion for Relief Related to Mar-A-Lago Raid & Unlawful Piercing of Attorney-Client Privilege" [566]. Morning session conducted under seal to protect materials as to which grand jury secrecy applies and/or as to which Defendant Trump asserts attorney-client privilege or work product protection. Afternoon session reopened to the public. Total time in court: 4 hours. Attorney Appearances: Jay I. Bratt, David Harbach, John M. Pellettieri, Michael Thakur, Todd Blanche, Emil Bove, Lazaro Fields, Kendra Wharton, Stanley Woodward, Sasha Dadan, Larry Donald Murrell, Jr. & John S. Irving. [657] Paperless Order: In light of the extensive, newly submitted materials filed by the Special Counsel & Defendant Trump in support of and/or in opposition to the Special Counsel's Motion to Modify Conditions of Release [592], the Court will permit the parties to file one final supplemental brief in response to those newly submitted materials, not to exceed 10 double-spaced pages, on or before 7/5/24. The Court takes note of the additional court orders included in composite exhibit 11 to the Special Counsel's recently filed Notice [652]. Consistent with the Court's statements during the 6/25/24, afternoon hearing [649], the Court will consider such orders as cited legal authority on the Motion, not as part of the developed evidentiary record in this proceeding & not for the factual findings set forth in those separate proceedings. The evidentiary record on the Motion is closed. Absent leave of Court, no further exhibits shall be attached to the authorized final supplemental briefs. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/27/24.
6/27/24 Update: In her ruling, the judge, Aileen M. Cannon, said she would hold a hearing to reconsider another judge’s decision to allow prosecutors to pierce the attorney-client privilege of one of rump’s lawyers under what is known as the crime-fraud exception. That provision allows the government to get around the normal protections afforded to a lawyer’s communications with a client if it can prove that legal advice was used to commit a crime. Depending on how Judge Cannon ultimately rules, her decision to redo the fraught & lengthy legal arguments about the crime-fraud exception could deal a serious blow to the obstruction charges in the indictment of Trump. Even if she ends up confirming the initial judge’s findings, holding yet another hearing on the issue will take more time & play into Trump’s strategy of delaying the case from going to trial for as long as possible.
6/28/24 Docket Update: [658] System Entry-Docket Entry 658 restricted/sealed until further notice. [659] Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Supplemental Expert Disclosures by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira. Responses due by 7/12/24.
7/1/24 Docket update: [660] Paperless ORDER granting Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Rule 16 Expert Disclosures 659. On or before 7/30/24, the Special Counsel shall file supplemental expert disclosures. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 7/1/24. [661] Reply to response to Motion by Trump re [612] Motion to Dismiss [85] Indictment, based on Spoliation of Evidence in Violation of Due Process.
7/2/24 Docket update: [662] Speedy Trial Report-Eighteenth Speedy Trial Report by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira.
7/5/24 Docket update: [663] Notice of Supplemental Authority re [326] Motion to Dismiss [85] Indictment, Based on the Unlawful Appointment & Funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith, [324] Motion to Dismiss [85] Indictment, Based On Presidential Immunity by Trump. [664] Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Briefing re the Implications of Trump v. United States re [324] Motion to Dismiss [85] Indictment, Based On Presidential Immunity, Motion to Stay Further Proceedings until [324] Motion to Dismiss [85] Indictment, Based On Presidential Immunity & [326] Motion to Dismiss [85] Indictment, Based on the Unlawful Appointment & Funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith, are Resolved by Trump as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira. Responses due by 7/19/24. Exhibits A & B. [665[ Response Government's Supplemental Brief re Motion to Modify Conditions of Relief by USA as to Trump/ [666] Response In Opposition to 652 Notice of Filing by USA as to 592 Motion to Modify Conditions of Release by Trump to [652] Notice (Other) [667] Consent Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira. Responses due by 7/19/24. [668] Paperless Order granting [667] Special Counsel's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Overlength CIPA Submission. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 7/5/24.
7/6/24 Docket update: [669] Paperless Order temporarily granting in part & reserving ruling in part on Defendant Trump's Motion for Supplemental Briefing on Presidential Immunity & a Partial Stay [664]. In order to allow for full briefing on the Motion, and consistent with the Special Counsel's request for the standard response period, the Court stays the following impending deadlines: Defendants' Rule 16 expert disclosures, currently due 7/8/24; Defendants' reciprocal discovery, currently due 7/18/24; and Special Counsel's CIPA Sections 5-6 submission, currently due 7/10/24, although the Special Counsel may proceed with filing should it so elect. On or before 7/18/24, the Special Counsel shall respond to Defendant Trump's Motion to Stay & Request for Supplemental Briefing on Presidential Immunity. Any reply is due 7/21/24. The Court reserves ruling on the request for additional briefing pending receipt of the Special Counsel's response & Defendants' reply. No other deadlines are impacted by this Order. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 7/6/24. [670] Order denying [485] Defendant Nauta's Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment for Selective & Vindictive Prosecution. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 7/6/24.
7/9/24 Update: Trump is expected to launch a new legal battle to suppress any damaging evidence from his 2020 election-subversion case from becoming public before the 2024 election, preparing to shut down the potency of any “mini-trials” where high-profile officials could testify against him. The plans come after the US supreme court last week in its ruling that broadly conferred immunity on former presidents opened the door for the US district judge Tanya Chutkan to hold evidentiary hearings – potentially with witnesses – to determine what acts in the indictment can survive. In the coming months, Trump’s lawyers are expected to argue that the judge can decide whether the conduct is immune based on legal arguments alone, negating the need for witnesses or multiple evidentiary hearings, people familiar with the deliberations said. If prosecutors with the special counsel Jack Smith press for witnesses such as former vice-president Mike Pence or White House officials to testify, Trump’s lawyers are expected to launch a flurry of executive privilege and other measures to block their appearances. Link to story: Trump plans to block hearings in January 6 case before 2024 election
7/12/24 Docket update: [671] Notice of Supplemental Authority in Response re [663] Notice of Supplemental Authority, by USA as to Trump.
7/15/24 Update: Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment based on Appointments Clause Violations. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed Trump classified documents case citing unlawful appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith.
See post #671 (article) here: https://www.websleuths.com/forums/...ice-june-2023-trial-may-2024-2.686530/page-34
A round of applause, a standing ovation, shouts of HOORAH, and a virtual cake to show our appreciation for all the hard work and posts by @Niner on this thread.

Thank you!!
 
The chorus of a song from “Oklahoma’” popped into my head when I heard the news. Trump singing…

Oh, what a beautiful mornin',
Oh, what a beautiful day.
I got a beautiful feelin'
Ev'erything's goin' my way.
 
Correct decision. Judge Cannon clearly found constitutional issues in the appointment by Garland and the appropriations given to Smith, both of which came without the consent of Congress.


Exactly. Thank you
 
The fact remans that he did take the documents, hide and conceal them. Can another legal team, jurisdiction or whatever they are called, take up the prosecution at this point? Or is all that evidence just swept under the filthy carpet?
Didn't the crime of obstruction occur after he left he presidency? There are lots of issues in this case, but Cannon's dismissal causes grief for the DOJ- they can appeal and I am sure they will- if the appeal is granted, then Trump will take it to the Supreme Court- we are talking about a great deal of time- If Trump wins the presidency this, and the Jan 6 case will go away anyway.,
 
Correct decision. Judge Cannon clearly found constitutional issues in the appointment by Garland and the appropriations given to Smith, both of which came without the consent of Congress.

I had a feeling this one wouldn't go anywhere.
 
Whoever is deleting posts, I did not post about the campaign I posted the judges remarks in her order including a link.

You cancel my account, the utterly heavy handed and inept moderation on this board is absolutely imbecelic. It is ludicrous in this day and age.

you.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
224
Guests online
2,307
Total visitors
2,531

Forum statistics

Threads
599,699
Messages
18,098,258
Members
230,901
Latest member
IamNobody
Back
Top