Actually, I don't know that we will ever learn all of what KM has/had to say (during the proffer) because there's a big difference between what's said and what is ruled by the court as admissible.
While hearsay evidence is often allowed during a preliminary hearing, it is generally not allowed at trial. I expect the defense will continue to be very careful about not opening any doors here. (If I recall correctly, CA was indicted by a grand jury and not bound over for trial by prelim hearing).
Hearsay is legally defined as, "A statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted." Hearsay is inadmissible at trial, which means that a witness cannot quote what someone outside the courtroom said.
In other words, I expect KM's testimony will pretty much be specific to KM and CA and not the extended members of the family. MOO
More about hearsay at the link below.
Don't let hearsay ruin your case. Learn how to get around it today!
www.bundylawoffice.com