FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen *3 guilty* #15

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
July 17th call logs

Rash is also doing that other technique again
Asking questions about slides but without the slides being published on screen for the jury.

This makes it hard for the jurors doesn't it? hard to follow
 
Apparently the lady in the pink cause the disruption in the gallery that caused the judge to admonish spectators.
 
Ruth Markel just got ejected as phone rang! Feel so sorry for her!

This was posted on twitter Surviving The Survivor podcast earlier today:
For those in #Tallahassee please feel free to come over to the offices of Jansen Davis at 125 North Franklin Blvd tonight at 7pm.

Ruth Markel will be here signing copies of her book “The Unveiling”

She’s having a difficult time and could use the support!
 
If you read the transcript carefully, Charlie is not threatening to kill whoever is threatening them. It’s complicated, but it sounds to me like he is saying that the person who is blackmailing them knows he’s messing with “the king,” Sigfredo, and if you do that, “you’d better kill him.” When it’s all chopped up and you can hardly hear it, it sounds like he’s talking about himself, how he wants to kill the blackmailer or have him killed. But if you really look at it written down, that’s not what he’s saying. He’s speaking as though he is the blackmailer.

This alleged threat Charlie made to have whoever was doing this killed is a big part of the state’s case. It was in a lot of the news coverage. It’s sensational. Because they couldn’t really hear the context until they got the expert. But I think you can poke holes in it. Especially if Charlie testifies.
Certainly they will try to poke holes in it, just as Katie attempted to poke holes in it during the last trial. Its a devastating piece of evidence and probably one of the highest priorities over the past year has been to have Charlie figure out how to explain everything. However, there is SO much in here that is going to be incredibly difficult to explain such as "If they had any evidence we would have already gone to the airport" and "When the police show up, and there's a doctor -- there's an oral surgeon standing there with a dead gang member in his driveway, they're not gonna come down too hard on me." My personal belief is that Charlie would likely be convicted if the only thing presented was the bump wire and this transcript.
 
ARE there cell site issues going to Jupiter? How is he getting away with this? At least rephrase. This guy is making stuff up. He could at least say “Isn’t it possible there could be cell tower issues.” Every witness that seems so solid with the state just keeps getting roped into answering these questions and helping the defense. Do they know why they’re there?
 
Frankly this judge has been more than lenient with the gallery. Most judges will take your phone away or remove you as soon as your phone goes off. There are signs in courtrooms saying you have to turn your phone off. And judges admonish spectators all the time about that issue. Phones have gone off in the gallery a handful of times already. It’s only day 3. It’s distracting and disrespectful to the courtroom. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
2,483
Total visitors
2,656

Forum statistics

Threads
602,940
Messages
18,149,323
Members
231,595
Latest member
Finch5800
Back
Top