FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen *4 Guilty* #23

[Knitpicker]

As to the possible set up of LaCasse, it's interesting to listen to Jane and Wendi discuss Jeff in the police interview room. I'm very curious to know Jane's take on that discussion today. Does she think Wendi primed the pump by claiming Jeff' had a jealous nature in the days prior to the shooting, or did she bring up Jeff organically?

Jane is just one of several people in Wendi's orbit who have never spoken publicly about the case. (The women that Wendi met for lunch that day are also in that category.) One way or another, their testimony could end up playing a large factor at trial.

The LaCasse discussion starts at 2:13:34:

Jane walked with Wendi 2 days before the murder.
(Even though she had laryngitis and couldn't talk to Dan).
I am sure she discussed a lot with her.

 

[Knitpicker]

Rightly or wrongly the State are holding off on arresting WA until after DAs trial and conviction. Her conviction makes the case against WA infinitely stronger, simply because it would be extremely unlikely that CA and DA would conspire to kill DA without WA's knowledge and approval. Obviously that's not going to be enough to convict WA, the State needs strong evidence, but DA's conviction gives them an upper hand in WA's trial.

I think the State also has lots more evidence that incriminates WA that they have not released and also more evidence that will be produced as they continue with pulling data from the various electronic devices, this can take months. There will be a number of witness depositions in August as well which will strengthen their case e.g deposition of Sara Yousef who went to the University of Miami and then severed ties with WA for unknown personal issues. The State aren't taking her deposition because Wendi called her fat, it will be something significant and relating to DM's murder.

Other incriminating evidence that I think will be forthcoming that will further incriminate WA:

• OK Cupid data showing WA intended to move to Miami before DM was killed
• lunch dates testimony detailing WA's state of mind, presumably she was all over the place
• Geek squad testimony. He would have told WA within 1 minute of seeing the TV it could not be repaired. They did not have the parts to repair cheap TVs as it was not economically viable. However he remained there for 40 minutes.
• DA was an obsessive note taker and organiser, I believe there will be something in her notebooks and devices that shows WA was planning to move to Miami pre-murder e.g google searches for schools
• WA's cellbrighted phone. New tech developed feb 2024 allowed LE to do much deeper data recovery on phones.
• WA's WhatsApp data. In 2016, on the day of the bump, CA admitted he had been messaging WA all day on WhatsApp. Yet when WA was on the stand in the various trials she played dumb when asked about WhatsApp, unsure of her history with the app. If she was a prodigious WhatsApp user in 2016, then the likelihood she would have been in 2014.

How about the condo her parents rented for her in may 2014, before the first attempt? That she moved into right after the murder?
The one that was 12K a month, that they had to put an 80K deposit on?
How about when asked on the stand by GC where she went after she left Miami, she lied and said she lived in Coral Springs?

The condo was in the Continuum , the one Patty reported to the FBI a couple of months ago. The one where she put her address there on a work order for Dans roof that was damaged by ironically a falling tree?

 

[Knitpicker]

It seems that ‘viewership’ of the Dan Markel case has grown exponentially in the past year. I’ve been following the case for about 4 years and I have always said that I believe in the ‘possibility’ that Donna and Charlie may have done this behind Wendi’s back. I no longer feel like the community leper because I’m starting to see more people express that same opinion. In the past that opinion was not well received by other case followers and I have always been puzzled at why people take it personally and attacked people with that view and accused them of being on the Adelson PR team or of being a ‘troll’.

I’m not posting my above perspective to debate the evidence because nothing of substance regarding Wendi has changed in 2 years. I’m looking forward to Donna’s trial with the hopes that the state releases something new that helps to bring more clarity to Wendi’s potential role. I just don’t understand how anyone can question the motive of someone that follows the case that shares my perspective or a similar perspective. Had 10 years not passed since Dan was murdered, I’d be more inclined to believe the very common belief that the state is leveraging the ‘one-by-one’ prosecution strategy. Personally, I do not believe that is their strategy, I really think it's a simple case of the state not being confident that they have a strong enough case against Wendi – another opinion that for some reason people have an issue with. Rant over.

How about Patty finding the condo Donna and Harvey rented for Wendi in May 2014? How did they know she was to be moving down there?
Do you know how she found this out?
She found a roof work order for Dans house ,or insurance filing by Wendi who lived in the said condo rented by her parents…the one rented BEFORE THE MURDER.

Isn’t that important new evidence?
So important, Patty contacted the FBI.

 

[Going Rogue]

Your stance was always that she may have only known “after the fact”.
Never part of the planning.
Ps I didn’t put all those question marks
I was making a statement, not asking a question,

I have no personal issue with you, but need to point out that you are totally misrepresenting my stance. I have always been very clear that its possible she wasn’t directly involved but I never proclaimed her innocence and have been very clear that I can see it either way and have said MULTIPLE times its possible she was involved. I never said she may have only known “after the fact” OR she was “never part of the planning”. Not sure where or who you got that from? I say ‘who’ because a couple others that I know you fawn over have said the same thing for some bizarre reason, so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and perhaps you heard it from someone you think is a reliable source? I know you know my handle on Reddit and YouTube. I challenge you to find ANY comment by me where I stated what you are alleging.

 

[Zedzded]

I know you know my handle on Reddit and YouTube.

Who are you on Reddit? I'm No_violinist.

 

[Zedzded]

How about the condo her parents rented for her in may 2014, before the first attempt? That she moved into right after the murder?

Couldn't HA/DA say that they planned to move into it? Was this near where they lived?

 

[Going Rogue]

How about Patty finding the condo Donna and Harvey rented for Wendi in May 2014? How did they know she was to be moving down there?
Do you know how she found this out?
She found a roof work order for Dans house ,or insurance filing by Wendi who lived in the said condo rented by her parents…the one rented BEFORE THE MURDER.

Isn’t that important new evidence?
So important, Patty contacted the FBI.

I think you got the story wrong, I heard what Patty said. It was known a LONG time ago Donna & Harvey rented a condo before Dan’s murder and, YES, its very possible that it was in anticipation of Wendi’s move to S. Florida. Which is really no surprise because we know with 99% certainty that Donna was in on the plans to murder Dan. What Patty shared is Wendi likely lied about her ‘new’ address after she relocated to S. Florida and that’s what she reported to the FBI. Either way, what you described or what Patty shared doesn’t implicate Wendi. Unless you can explain how, I don’t see it.

 

[Going Rogue]

Who are you on Reddit? I'm No_violinist.

I knew who you are there and I seriously love your posts there and here. I no longer exist on Reddit at least on that sub-reddit – the mod’s banned me there for ‘breaking community guidelines’.. I hope I don’t disappoint you – I was Civil-Fix