In my opinion it will be difficult to show bad faith. And I think I was wrong about when the state got the evidence of that text, it could have been when they arrested Charlie and seized his phone, or they could have been monitoring his phone earlier, right? Do we know when they got notice of that text and how long they’ve had it? Either way, they had it at Charlie’s trial, and they didn’t make this same argument. And if it’s the case that they were looking at Charlie’s phone records since as far back as the time of the bump, the defense would have known about that, no?