Of course you don’t know. That’s my point - there is no proof the judge gave Wendi ANY information or anything of substance or anything that compromised the investigation or was unethical / inappropriate. All we know is Donna told Charlie that Wendi told her she is going to get information from the judge.
Yet you said –
“the judge gave Wendi information that she should not have been privy to”, and are basing that statement on what Donna said to Charlie. My point remains, lets give BOTH judges a little more credit. I think a lot of people are making the same assumption you are making. I literally had this same conversation with someone else over 2 years ago about this very incident
![Wink ;) ;)]()
I don't mean to offend your thought process - I had a feeling Mentour Lawyers video was going to open up this debate.