FL FL - Leila Cavett, 21, of GA (son Kamdyn, 2, found on street), Miramar, 27 July 2020 #3 *arrest*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trinitee

aka "BullyBuster"
Joined
Nov 23, 2016
Messages
580
Reaction score
1,821
Miramar police: Little boy found wandering still not identified
HGRPURKXJJCDJJ6HQ3F3KIR6W4.jpg


MIRAMAR, Fla. – Miramar police were alerted Sunday morning about a small boy found alone near the 1860 block of SW 68th Ave.

A woman who helped search for the boy’s parents, told Local 10 that a neighbor had seen the child wandering and had been asking around to see if anyone knew anything about him.

Miramar police: Little boy found wandering still not identified


Thread #1
Thread #2

upload_2020-8-2_10-59-26.jpeg

FL - Leila Cavett, 20 of GA (son Kamdyn, 2, found wandering), Miramar, 27 July 2020*MEDIA,MAPS,TIMELINE*
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ADMIN NOTE:

True Crime Society is not an approved source at Websleuths.

Also please remember that sleuthing of anyone other than a victim or an officially named POI/suspect is not allowed. In this case there is no officially named POI at this time.
 
There are so many TOS violations in this thread, it may not get cleaned up until WS staff pick themselves up off the floor and stop hyperventilating.

Folks, READ THE RULES !! .. some of which are:

Members may sleuth the victim and the victim's social media. Member can NOT sleuth people who are not an officially named POI or suspect in any case and post about it in this public discussion where the whole world can read what is said.

If you want to refer to a friend of the victim who has been in MSM, you may use initials and discuss what is said by them or about them in MSM but ...you may NOT sleuth the social media of that person or anyone other than the victim and/or an officially named perp and post about it on this public thread.

IF you wish to sleuth and discuss someone behind the scenes, you may do so in private conversations with other members where you can add up to 20 members to the discussion. Just don't bring any of that private discussion to the public thread.

Websleuths is fact based on what is in MSM and what is shared by LE. Do NOT bring social media rumors to Websleuths and do not refer to them.

Again, please read The Rules that you agreed to upon joining Websleuths (most importantly in this thread, the two sections entitled Etiquette & Information, and Social Media - Facebook, Twitter, etc.).

The Rules are linked in my signature below.


 
I’ve been searching court records in Walker County, Alabama. What are the rules about those types of sources?

Sorry Gatherer, I'm haven't been through the entire thread yet so not sure this has been answered yet.

Public records are allowed as long as they are related to the victim and not to any other individual who is not a named POI or suspect.
 
In the earlier days of this thread, we added the info and it was deleted.

Not sure where the info was sourced, but if it was from Leila's social media, it is allowed. Posts/links to her social media may have been removed in the very early stages of this thread when she had not been officially announced as Kamdyn's mother and that she was missing.
 
Just thought I would let everyone know you might want to join, "Leila Cavett Missing Updates & Discussion Group". There is a lot of information they are throwing out there. A lot of hearsay though too so you have to weed it out. I have been a member for a few days now.

It is a private group.

Members can not bring any information from that group to this discussion at Websleuths.
 
Hey everyone, please remember ...

Sleuthing of anyone who is not officially named a POI or suspect by LE is NOT allowed. Discussing what is said about them in MSM or what they themselves have said in MSM, or what is said by LE is allowed, but sleuthing them is NOT.

Members may sleuth to their heart's content in private but not post their findings on this public thread unless/until a POI/suspect is named by LE.

ETA: Also please remember it is WS policy to use initials for everyone other than victim and officially named perp.

Thanks.
 
Hi, SB. The FBI has posted a vehicle of interest and that vehicle belongs to a certain individual. In the absence of official POI designation, can we discuss that individual with initials only?

Depends on how that vehicle of interest was matched up to an individual (i.e. was it by licence plate? or person just has a similar looking vehicle on social media?). Unless/until LE officially names a POI as the driver of that vehicle we can't be sure that the registered owner and the driver are one and the same person.

As in most threads, no sleuthing of non POI/suspects is allowed. Discussion/speculation on what the person has said in MSM or what has been said about them in MSM is okay, but actual sleuthing of them and their social media is not allowed.
 
ADMIN NOTE:

Posts have been removed.

Publicly sleuthing individuals (this includes sleuthing and discussing their social media) who have not been officially named a POI or suspect is a violation of Websleuths TOS unless a thread specific exception has been approved by Tricia. That approval has NOT been given in this case.

Members may discuss and speculate on what has been said about an individual in MSM or what they have said in MSM, but sleuthing them and posting about it on this public discussion thread is not allowed.

WSers inserting themselves into an investigation by calling potential case players and hanging up is simply beyond the pale by Websleuths high standards.
 
ADMIN NOTE:

As previously posted by Admin, this man's social media is off limits unless/until he is officially named a POI or suspect by LE.

Members may discuss what he has said in MSM or what is said about him in MSM or by LE, but he is not sleuthable by Websleuths TOS.

Also, random youtube sources are not allowed.

If members wish to sleuth non POIs, you may do so behind the scenes and discuss with others through private conversations where you can add up to 20 other WSers to the convo. Just do NOT post your findings on the public thread until a POI/suspect has been named (or unless a thread specific exception is announced by Tricia or Admin).

Thanks.
 
ADMIN WARNING:

For some reason members are choosing to ignore my previous two Admin Notes in this thread that were very clear about sleuthing individuals who are not officially named POIs or suspects.

Read WS social media rules. It is a violation of Websleuths Terms of Service (aka The Rules) to link to or discuss the social media of anyone other than the victim or an officially named POI/suspect.

Do not ignore The Rules, or Moderator and Administrator notes, reminders, warnings. The next member to violate this rule will receive a 2 week Time Out.
 
A question about what we can post. Is the moderator saying that we cannot mention SR at all? There are articles in the MSM about his social media rantings, but I guess he isn't officially a suspect yet. It's kind of confusing to me as to what we can say. Can we say anything about this person at all?

It is fine to discuss or speculate within reason on whatever SR has said in MSM or whatever is said about him or his social media in MSM. Just no sleuthing of or linking to their social media unless/until they are officially named POI/suspect by LE (or unless a thread specific exception is made by Tricia or Admin to allow such discussion. Thread specific exceptions are rarely made.)
 
To answer a post that has been removed ...

Members may not sleuth SR's business and post about it on this public discussion thread.

There is a difference between discussing what is in MSM vs sleuthing. "Sleuthing" is seeking out information that is not contained in MSM (i.e. social media, personal information, businesses, background info, etc).

Members may sleuth on their own behind the scenes for whatever information they want, but just can't post it on this public discussion thread unless/until the individual has been named by LE as a POI/suspect. (Members can have private discussion where they can add up to 20 other members to the private conversation.)

Hope that clarifies. If members have questions, please private message a Mod or Admin so the thread doesn't become derailed with off topic info.

Thanks.
 
I personally feel that SR lied about everything he said. Toxic/abusive guys normally portray girls in a negative light and I think he said all those mean things about Leila to make her look like a horrible mother/person. Classic trait of a toxic man. JMO
 
SR “said he came down to Hollywood because one of his students was sick. When she got hospitalized with pneumonia, he said he called Cavett to take the student’s place on an unspecified project that would take him into the Keys and the Everglades. He said he called Cavett “because she’s a survivor. I’m going out in the woods, the Everglades.””

A Miami Herald report written by Daniel J Neal on Aug 16.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article245003380.html

MSM

Also: SR’s residence listed as Muscle Schoals, Ala.
 
Last edited:
Ryan claims he met Cavett when she showed up at his house on a rainy night, filthy, pushing a similarly filthy baby carriage with goods, food and Kamdyn. After she told him a story Ryan said he didn’t believe about being abandoned, he said he took her and her son into his home. Despite helping Cavett get a car, Ryan said, she stole from him twice.

I hexed her,” Ryan said. “Until you return my (stuff), everything you took, everywhere you go, people will try to take your son.”

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article245003380.html#storylink=cpy

What a creep.
 
I think Ryan’s story could be believable and his body language normal for someone that likes attention.
The only problem I seen was that he would have texted Leila as soon he seen the truck title was not in the truck and he didn’t do that.
He also wouldn’t have just continued to hang out waiting for her to show up when he had plans for Leila to work with him.

RYAN’S STORY OF CAVETT’S DISAPPEARANCE - Bing video
 
Last edited:
From the article: “According to Curtis, he was told that Ryan was the last person seen with Cavett at a RaceTrac gas station the night of her disappearance.”

IF true, so much for the “black car” and Leila and Kam riding off into the sunset with them.... (shocking, I know)

I keep going back to the video where he said this about her leaving in the car and it would be on video. Could he have told LE this and it’s part of the lying charges?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
92
Guests online
438
Total visitors
530

Forum statistics

Threads
608,465
Messages
18,239,792
Members
234,378
Latest member
Moebi69
Back
Top