Very possible. But what if he was not someone that repeatedly killed just to kill. What if only when he really needed a car part, money, or needed full undisputed control over the household money?Richard said:There are some similarities which are quite apparent between these two cases. The name Peggy is a derivitive of the name Margaret. Both women were from the same town, and they were about the same age at death (23 and 25). Both were driving 1959 cars made by General Motors, and both were away from home a short distance when they were last seen.
Five years went by between these two cases. Could there have been other attempted abductions, assults, or even murders between them? It may be another case which links and solves one or the other of these two.
The car from the first victem was taken if I remember right and never found. I wonder if it was traded for help in disposing of the body or if the car was taken because certain 1959 parts were needed or money was needed from selling such a car or its parts. . . . perhaps even parts that could be used on other model cars as well as the one it came from. The second murder could have been more about his spending money, perhaps on someone else and she found out and they argued. The second victem's car was already his so no need to hide or dispose of that one for help or for parts . . . .but what became of the wife's 1959 car after she disappeared?