This same news was posted elsewhere, and one poster assessed it from a personal viewpoint as a trained, experienced Search & Rescue diver (not from FL, but presumably just as reliable or unreliable as any WS poster who is not verified as an search & recovery team member, but who claims to be )
"I was a recovery diver and swift-water recovery volunteer for about 16 years in Southern California. I was also a shipyard and military rescue swimmer, and rec diver, and I’ve gone in the water for 3 or 4 FD’s. There absolutely are some FD’s and PD’s who do cross-team for water recovery, and some FD’s or PD’s may maintain a dive team, like NYPD, (more frequently it was under the Sheriff’s, as we were) but water recovery is a very specialized activity, normally managed at the County level.
These cops are told to not go in.
I’m impressed that they even looked like they were going to try.
I wouldn’t have gone in there either, unless I had been familiarized with that pond.
We spent a LOT of time out in the field, looking at any location like this where you might reasonably have had a chance of a vehicle going into the water. That’s what the volunteers did. We went out and surveyed ponds like this. No gators in SoCal . . Lots of shopping carts though.
We would have already gone into this pond, if it was as large as it seems to be. That’s actually a good training pond." bbm
He & others list factors making a 'rescue effort' in these circumstances unadvisable for trained & experienced SAR ppl, (let alone untrained, inexp'ed LEOs or others):
-- lack of exp & training in this particular pond,
--lack of proper equipment, boat, scuba gear, breathing equipmt, wet suits, underwater lighting, tools to break glass & force open car doors underwater, cables, etc
-- presence/existence of alligators & poisonous snakes in/near water.
--in darkness.
--inability to visually locate car precisely (not knowing how much further it was carried by forward momentum before engine stopped).
-- and more.
Every year we read/hear about multiple cases where ppl 'jump in' to save others (loved ones or strangers), and some of these would-be rescuers lose their own lives.
Some ppl here who say LEOs should have gone in may be recalling fictional accounts shown on TV/movies/vid games, of heroically spectacular saves.
Anyone here without training, experience, & equpment who wants to jump in & depend on dumb, blind luck in such a situation may do so.
But personally I do not expect untrained, inexperienced and unequipped LEOs or anyone to risk jeopardize their lives to save others when trained experienced, equipped SAR teams would not have done so.
Esp when those in peril are facing foreseeable consequences (i.e. drowning) of their own actions (i.e., driving car into a dark pond in the dark).
Teenage mistake(s) that morning, pulling off the road, driving into a pond? Yes? Sad, sad, sad for those teens, families, friends? Yes.
JM2cts.