<<snipped>>
I, on the other hand, not only heard testimony of the crime scene, but heard testimony of all the evidence presented to the jury. I got a bigger picture than Dr. G did.
Dr G. is the Chief Medical Examiner for Orange and Osceola counties in FL, and has worked in the capacity of a medical examiner since 1988.
It sounds odd to assume any WS member could possibly get a bigger picture for a cause of death than a medical examiner who has been practicing for the last 23 plus years.
Dr G.'s expertise and professional abilities are not a matter of opinion, they are facts. Sure, she's human and can make mistakes. What you are suggesting is that she made a huge mistake, which is very, very unlikely.
I know that as many times as I've read posters who agree with the verdict, and listened or watched the jurors explain their decision, nothing I've read, heard or seen has made me find common ground with the acquittal.
I'm one of the posters here who felt very BADLY after the not guilty verdict but did not get angry with the jurors. I only began to feel outrage when the jurors started speaking up. I have a very open mind, in fact I can be gullable and easily swayed by a persuasive person . . . as long as they rely upon LOGIC and REASON.
So far, I have not read, heard or seen revealed a logical, reasonable argument to help me understand why the jury acquitted this woman.
I'm sorry, but claiming that you see MORE than Dr. Garavaglia in this case as far as evidence is absurd. I apologize if this hurts your feelings. I am sure you are a perfectly fine person, but you are not weaving reason into your arguments, and yes, I'll be the judge of that. Again, no offense to you as a person, I just have a big problem with your claim.