housemouse
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
- Messages
- 1,399
- Reaction score
- 2
Fascinating, you made it later than I and thank you. I have a question for the pros that has been weighing heavily on my ability to understand charts of the "bad guys".. If we already know these are seriously evil, creepy guys, when we see the potential for harming Haleigh, wouldnt all of them show that? How does one differeniate that and the possibility of direct involvement?
In other words, there is one in particular that concerns me, if you were to assume involvement, what would I see potentially that would differ from the garden variety skeeve?
I am probably the most conservative astrologer posting, Drivenon, and am reluctant to run charts on individuals that have not been definitively connected to the case by Law Enforcement.
Particularly when we do not have an exact birth time, for this ties down the most personal parts of the natal charts of the individuals we are considering. These are the ascendants, midheavens, Moons, and important midpoints in cross aspect.
You are right, in my opinion, in wondering how to differentiate definitive involvement from the "garden variety skeeve". And this is why I worry about making assumptions.
That said, Mary, who has posted above, makes the point that she hopes the guy is checked out, not that she thinks he is the guilty one, so please keep that in mind.
Also remember that we astrologers are not to predict, for that is considered sinful in the Bible, for very good reason. There is a difference between forecasting when the astrological "weather" might be bad, and prediction. One is general, the other specific.