butwhatif?
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 3,598
- Reaction score
- 40
Tonya's version of putting medicine on one UNRELATED alleged victims genitals ...HUGE RED FLAG to me. Who in their right mind does that?
See, that's where the whole thing got really confusing. because most reports were coming via twitter, or in articles updated minute by minute, and were short sentences using the word 'witness' instead of clearly identifying each witness by A,B,C,D,E ect, I think it caused a lot of confusion.
I thought it was an unrelated child that she used the cream on, then read another article where it stated it was her own daughter. Then another article says it was a student. :banghead::banghead:
I'm sure it was made clearer for the jury. And they got to actually see the victims, which would have made a BIG difference.
Kinda OT: I had a friend who was sexually abused as a small baby under her mothers watch. When my friend reached her 20's her mother finally admitted that the Dad would lock himself in the room with the baby for hours, and he was without a doubt abusing her.
When she had her baby, she was absolutely TERRIFIED of using any diaper rash cream on her own child, because she felt like she was sexually abusing her.
I even felt weird about using the cream on my DD's, even though I knew I was doing it to help them, not hurt them.
If an eight year old, related, or unrelated asked me to put cream on them down there, I'd likely tell them to do it themselves. If they're old enough to wipe themselves in the bathroom- they can apply cream by themselves.
I say this because I wouldn't ever want it to be misconstrued as something abusive.
Back on topic now, even though we have a not guilty verdict, we still don't really have the truth. I hope it comes out someday.
It would be interesting to know which 'abusive movie' one of the victims starred in and what the plot was.
ALL JMO