Contrary to how trials are portrayed on television, there are actually rarely shocking surprises, at least to the prosecution and the defense. We, the observers, are frequently surprised or shocked at information that comes out in trial, but with discovery it is highly unusual that both teams don't already know exactly what is going to be said on the stand by which witnesses, and what evidence and counter-theories will be presented. So what I look for is how the prosecution presents its case, whether they seem amenable to a deal, etc. And in this case what I see is a prosecution team that is going methodically through the process of proving that Elkins and Lang were responsible for Antonio's death, not Sherry West or DL's cousin or anyone else. And that Elkins pulled the trigger. That's what I see.
In this case, I believe the 'truth' will come out that Sherry West has mental issues, that she has done drugs, that she has been a less than stellar mother to her adult daughter and that she took the baby out walking in a place that the child's father had specifically warned her not to go. IMO, he is testifying against her because he blames her for Antonio's death, not that she actually did it or had a hand in it, but that she defied him by walking (in broad daylight) in what the father considered a dangerous part of town and she must therefore be punished. (By the way, this guy's a real prize, isn't he?? Police were called over him shouting at SW not long after Antonio's death and now he is testifying against the mother of his murdered child. Father of the year, this one.)
Anyway, none of these 'truths' that will 'come out' add up to Sherry West being a model citizen, but they also don't add up to her murdering her own baby or hiring two gunmen and buying their continuing silence as to her involvement with that pitiful $5,000 life insurance payout. IMO, of course, but it seems to be the opinion shared by LE and the prosecution, who have access to ALL the evidence.