In the room?... no. Outside the room? yes. The defendant is allowed to consult with his/her attorney.The defense attorney isn’t allowed in the room, correct?
Is that only if he's asked questions?In the room?... no. Outside the room? yes. The defendant is allowed to consult with his/her attorney.
Yes. The defendant can be called to testify, however the defense attorney is not allowed to present evidence.
Link:
Charging
In most cases the accused has an opportunity -- not required by law, unlike a jury trial -- to testify,
6 of your questions about grand juries, answered
It's not that the judge didn't want to hear from him today, it's that he waved his right to first appearance, meaning he can choose whether to be in the courtroom or not, as long as he has an attorney. The attorney can/will physically be at the arraignment with, or without the defendant.Since the judge didn’t even want to hear from him today and postponed his appearance until Tuesday, I doubt that anyone will intervene.
It's not that the judge didn't want to hear from him today, it's that he waved his right to first appearance, meaning he can choose whether to be in the courtroom or not, as long as he has an attorney. The attorney can/will physically be at the arraignment with, or without the defendant.
Waving the right has to be done before the arraignment date, so I think it's fair to say that was done yesterday.
I read the warrants, and an arrest warrant was issued, meaning he has 72 hours to be arraigned from the time he was booked.
I think it's also fair to say that he was arraigned today (although I haven't read anything about it), he entered his plea through his attorney, and the charges were explained to him by his attorney.
If the judge postponed arraignment until Tuesday, that would be beyond the 72 hour limit.
What was postponed until Tuesday was the judge setting bail.
I haven't read the stats to compare, but around the mid/late 60's there were lots of violent riots, and protests. Civil rights, and Vietnam etc.You don't think overall crime has gone up ?Home invasions, carjackings, drive bys were rare or unheard of. Murder including by spouse or ex is more common. I read about one man who murdered his wife and two small children. The daughters were put in a tank of oil and the wife was buried close by in the ground. Assault and battery. But, on the plus side, bank robberies have probably gone down thanks to technology.
So if the DA says: "Mr. Brooks was cordial, co-operative, and even jovial with the officers before Officer Rolfe shot him''--- and leaves out the part about him assaulting the officers, taking a taser and shooting one of them, Rolfe just has to sit there and say nothing?This is from your link. Either way I doubt Officer Rolfe will testify before a grand jury.
I'll answer my own question since I enjoy talking to myself anyway:Any update on whether or not Atlanta police are showing up for work today?
So if the DA says: "Mr. Brooks was cordial, co-operative, and even jovial with the officers before Officer Rolfe shot him''--- and leaves out the part about him assaulting the officers, taking a taser and shooting one of them, Rolfe just has to sit there and say nothing?
He has to sit there and say nothing unless he is questioned by the grand jury.So if the DA says: "Mr. Brooks was cordial, co-operative, and even jovial with the officers before Officer Rolfe shot him''--- and leaves out the part about him assaulting the officers, taking a taser and shooting one of them, Rolfe just has to sit there and say nothing?
So is this statement incorrect: 'at no time is Rolfe allowed to observe'?He has to sit there and say nothing unless he is questioned by the grand jury.
Having said that, I think it's safe to say he'll be asked questions.
In some cases, the grand jury will indict someone before they are even charged with a crime and the suspect has no clue there was a grand jury hearing at all.
For example, if I murder someone, and then I flee the country, and my DNA and fingerprints and other evidence is all over the crime scene, and the DA feels there's enough evidence to convict, there could be a grand jury indictment before I am even arrested.
It appears that Officer Brosnan has Donald Samuel as his attorney.ok thank you.
Ex-officer charged in Rayshard Brooks' fatal shooting will spend weekend in jail
Fulton County Magistrate Court Judge Jeffrey Frazier said the seriousness of charges against Rolfe prevented him from setting bail on Friday. Court records showed that a bond hearing for Rolfe has been scheduled for Tuesday at 2 p.m. ET.
Rolfe will be allowed to remain in the room while the jury is in session.So is this statement incorrect: 'at no time is Rolfe allowed to observe'?
On January 6, 2020 Georgia police picked him up in Ohio for probation violation for failure to notify his probation officer he moved out of state. It's my opinion that when he went to court in GA, they decided to drop the charges, wash their hands of him and he would go back to Ohio. Little did they know he'd be back again.
Rolfe will be allowed to remain in the room while the jury is in session.
He won't be allowed in the room when the jury deliberates.
Domestic violence/ family is another charge. His criminal past shows he was a violent man and I could see that on the video the night he was shot.
Here you go.I believe you are talking about a jury trial. That’s something different. Yes he can be there, but we were talking about grand jury.
He will not be allowed to watch the prosecutor present the evidence to grand jurors.