GA GA - Shirley, 87, & Russell Dermond, 88, Putnam Co, 2 May 2014 - #13

[Razz]

They are basing the idea that she was not sexually assaulted, because she was found clothed. But a devious perp can put the clothes back on her. Sorry, if a guy's head is cut off, it's not that much of a stretch to consider that the wife was sexually assaulted.

Mrs D. had an autopsy. Certainly the medical examiner knows for certain. But, it seems a bit of a stretch that whoever did this would leave behind "his" dna inside Mrs D. And, imo Mr. D's head was taken because the perps couldn't retrieve the bullet used to kill him.

 

[concernedcitizen706]

Mrs D. had an autopsy. Certainly the medical examiner knows for certain. But, it seems a bit of a stretch that whoever did this would leave behind "his" dna inside Mrs D. And, imo Mr. D's head was taken because the perps couldn't retrieve the bullet used to kill him.

Well the DNA could be outside the body. That was how Dennis raider, btk, operated.

 

[vls12345]

I wish we would hear of further updates in this case.

Bumping.

 

[STAGNUM]

I wish we would hear of further updates in this case.

Bumping.

I think this will never be solved. Sheriff Sills should have involved GBI and FBI from the get go.

 

[STAGNUM]

Mrs D. had an autopsy. Certainly the medical examiner knows for certain. But, it seems a bit of a stretch that whoever did this would leave behind "his" dna inside Mrs D. And, imo Mr. D's head was taken because the perps couldn't retrieve the bullet used to kill him.

Wouldn't it be simpler, faster, cleaner, to simply dispose of the gun? Unless of course the gun was registered and had history of being fired. Hmmm, how could that be?