I should just start skipping over the 10 page arguments so I get caught up faster, but there always seems to be at least one post that I find relevant (not that the subjects being argued about aren't relevant, but stating things once or twice usually gets the point across MOO.) Now I have to try to remember what they were since I wasn't smart enough to use the multi-quote.
One thing is the video the vet did. I played that 3 times when it showed up on my FB page. One time I got a phone call and missed most of it, another time I got company and missed most of it, and the 3rd time I watched it all the way through. I've also watched it a couple more times over the last few days because of this case. If that puts me under suspicion, I have no young children, no grandchildren, no dogs and no cats.
I'm still not totally committed to any theory about this case, but I did have a few thoughts about IF he did do it on purpose.
First - I wonder if LH was supposed to go to pick up CH earlier than she did, grab someone from the DC and go to check the car, and freak out with her witness there. He may have sent the text asking when she was picking him up because she should have already been there.
Second - Did he want to get rid of CH because his sexting made him realize that he likes young girls and he wanted to try for one? If he does have a low sperm count from those treatments, he may have thought they could adopt one or two (not that it would be likely after CH's death).
Third - Did LH agree to go along with it in order to get rid of RH? It really seems like she's been trying to make him seem more guilty while saying she supports him.
I guess that's enough for now, I seem to write novels once I do catch up. :blushing: