wow. this is a really surprising post.
i've read this thread from the start and the only respectable thing about it has been the comments from jeannat, judicious something-or-other (sorry), and karmady. it is SHOCKING to me, the tone of this thread on this particular forum. seriously.
Not only that, but if what LE thinks about the defendant is determined by the charges they think they can prove, LE doesn't think he's a "murderer" in the sense that he intended to kill the child. LE thinks they can prove he was criminally negligent -- that's it. At least at the moment.