all4tara said:*BUMP*Has anyone heard/seen anything new?
Trino said:All appears quiet. I've heard no statements. It's eerie that few are talking, there are no updates, nor is there new information posted online. LE and GBI are closed-mouth. Very different than many of the cases profiled on web sites.
concernedperson said:Remember how quiet GBI was on SueAnn Ray's case? Granted it took longer than we would have wished for but the husband and father in law have been arrested. Look at Janet March's case too...sometimes it takes a while to unfold.But you know what makes me happy....is that they aren't getting away with their crimes. They have some time to suffer in solitude about what they have done but in the end justice will prevail. This is because of prosecutors in counties not because of the Bush administration.Lowly paid prosecutors, lowly paid health care professionals and people who make a difference. This isn't Enron and this isn't Dubai with megamillion bucks and a Cheney smilie face.This is people who do the work.
dulcinea said:I agree. Sometimes it's best when it gets quiet. It's tough for all of us who want more details, more info, but often this is when police are gathering the most important info. When a suspect feels like the police are at a loss, that is when he/she starts to slip up and BAM! he gets caught. Laying low gives LE time to focus on the facts, investigate more meticulously. If they have to stop and start all of the time to update the media, the momentum can slow down. This case isn't going away. People like Nancy Grace and all of Tara's family won't let that happen. Don't worry. It might take some time, but his case will be solved. Hang in there and pray.
This day and age anything is possible. I highly doubt it though.GeorgiaPeach said:This may be a crazy thought, but does anyone think the perpetrator could be an angry parent of a beauty contestant (who may have thought Tara had influence in the outcome of the beauty pageant).......and their child didn't win. . . . . .JUST A THOUGHT.......
GeorgiaPeach said:This may be a crazy thought, but does anyone think the perpetrator could be an angry parent of a beauty contestant (who may have thought Tara had influence in the outcome of the beauty pageant).......and their child didn't win. . . . . .JUST A THOUGHT.......
Ditto.GeorgiaPeach said:The only reason I thought that it was a possibility is because she disappeared shortly after a pageant (either that night or the next day).
I believe more the theory that her ex-boyfriend was involved.
GeorgiaPeach said:The only reason I thought that it was a possibility is because she disappeared shortly after a pageant (either that night or the next day).
I believe more the theory that her ex-boyfriend was involved.
Mygirlsadie said:Oh and I hope it gets solved soon I feel so bad for all involved here. I read on another Tara board that her dog is still in her back yard. Someone asked why it was left back there and it was said that Taras sister made that decision. Do any of you have any pretty good thoughts on to who is responsible for this? I am leaning towards X-BF or maybe even someone who was jealous of her? She is a beautiful girl with alot going for her. Brains and Beauty can bring out the worst in ugly duckings if you know what I mean...Also I looked up X-BF's info. and he is in the Army Reserves rank is E-4. (CPL) if its the right person, is his middle name Theo?
Bobbisangel said:I know that some of the girls came to her house and she helped them get ready for the pageant but I don't know if she anything more to do with it...like judging or something like that. My money is still on the ex-boyfriend. He had gotten pretty nasty calling her names if he saw her on the street, etc.
Must have had his back up about something.
concernedperson said:It is an interesting article. Thanks, PT. In reading through it Godwin mentions he hopes to get cell phone records from 1-2 of the men in Tara's life. Does he think they will just give it up to him? I am sure LE wouldn't volunteer that info.
Trino said:Wouldn't he be considered as working WITH LE?