Defense motions for a directed verdict on the statue of limitations grounds. His attorney mentions the tolling provision they believe cited by the State that "the crime was unknown at the time that the Statue would've run" and cites a previous Georgia case that said "tolling period ends when the State has actual knowledge of both defendant's identity and the crime". She says the State, relying on two testimonies in the case file, of law enforcement knowing both Ryan and Bo's names all the way back in 2005, additionally that all the evidence was seized in 2005, and that the statute of limitations if 4 years.
Judge asks her if the jury rejected some of that evidence and questions if they were waiting until after the verdict to bring this up.
The State responds that the jury was given this information and they made that determination and caselaw says "that is a question for the jury". Defense asks for Ryan to be given a bond since he was acquitted of the most serious charges and the one charge is a bondable offense.
Judge denies that completely, Ryan will remain in custody until sentencing on Monday. Even with Ryan possibly getting time served for the 5 or so years he has been in custody, I get some sense that this Judge will be imposing some more prison time if the max. is 10 years. He didn't even ask the State if they wanted to reply to the Defense asking for bond, seems like he already has his mind made up on that (not that the State would've argued to give him bond but not even asking if they have a response, which is something I've often seen as you hear from one side and then the other) was interesting.
Judge asks her if the jury rejected some of that evidence and questions if they were waiting until after the verdict to bring this up.
The State responds that the jury was given this information and they made that determination and caselaw says "that is a question for the jury". Defense asks for Ryan to be given a bond since he was acquitted of the most serious charges and the one charge is a bondable offense.
Judge denies that completely, Ryan will remain in custody until sentencing on Monday. Even with Ryan possibly getting time served for the 5 or so years he has been in custody, I get some sense that this Judge will be imposing some more prison time if the max. is 10 years. He didn't even ask the State if they wanted to reply to the Defense asking for bond, seems like he already has his mind made up on that (not that the State would've argued to give him bond but not even asking if they have a response, which is something I've often seen as you hear from one side and then the other) was interesting.