Hello Websleuths! I haven't followed this trial really closely and have been catching up on it more recently.....I know that the prevailing view here on WS is that JA is guilty of murder 1. Clearly, she is guilty and has said so (after having lied persistantly and fabricated bizarre stories) however, has anyone else noticed that Travis looks *angry* in the photo that is the straight on face shot in the shower? To me, he looks angry there.....his eyes are narrowed and his lips are in a fixed position of what I perceive as ire. I know that this comment may provoke rotten tomatoes to be tossed at me, but before you do, just know that I am in no way saying that I think that JA is innocent. I do wonder however, if there is a kernal of truth to her story of what happened at the time of Travis's killing. I wonder if she did drop the camera and if he was indeed angry with her about it ....the piece seems believable to me when I look at the evidence of the timeline and the pics. I question why if her intent was to kill him, why she took so long to do it once she arrived at his home? Did she exhibit any rageful tendencies towards him in the past? Did she make any incriminating statements to others indicating that she would want him gone, etc? Am I the only WS member who doesn't take the view point of the prosecution hook, line, and sinker? I think that she is guilty. The case for pre-meditation is one that I am not convinced of....or at least not yet. The oil cans didn't seal the deal for me....nor did changing her hair color......the missing gun from her Grandfather's home is the most compelling thing to me. however, even if she took a gun with her was her intent to kill or to protect herself on a long journey? I wish that they could recover that gun. Anyway,there is my disjointed question/commentary. I have missed you all! xoxo