Here's the burglary report + motion to preclude...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wow thanks for that! I really really hope the jury (if they believe any of whta Nurmi said in closing) goes thru each of his "it doesn't make sense" arguments and realizes that actually Nurmi's arguments don't make sense. For example, he said well if Jodi took the gun then why did she stage a burglary and thus now there is a record that the gun was stolen? Well, gee, Nurmi, let's see what would have happened if she hadn't done that: she takes the gun, kills Travis, and gets rid of the gun. She is NOT going to put the same gun back in the cabinet!! Detectives would have tested it and found out it was the SAME gun used to kill Travis. I'm assuming she figured the police department were at least capable of doing that. She couldn't have bought another .25 calibre to replace it later...it would have been traced back to her name. So she had to get rid of that gun...now there's a missing gun in her Grandpa's cabinet, in the same home where she was staying. Now, let's say after the murder detectives want to do some investigating on her b/c they're suspicious based on what Travis' friends have told him about her....they come in and do a search...ask Grandpa if there are any guns missing or anything missing from his home....Grandpa says "oh yeah, actually a .25 calibre pistol is missing"! Whoa...nothing else is missing, only the gun. That would have been more damaging to her than the situation is now, where at least she put a little doubt on the matter thru the "staged burglary."
Nurmi's arguments sounded good at the time he was saying it, but then afterwards I realized actually none of it make sense.