George Zimmerman /Trayvon Martin General Discussion #11 Tues. July 9

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tricia

Manager Websleuths.com
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 13, 2003
Messages
29,762
Reaction score
47,595
Dear Websleuths Members,

This thread will open the start of court on Tuesday July 9th

We are going to try opening one thread for the trial of George Zimmerman.

Discussions became so heated and hateful that we closed the whole Martin/Zimmerman discussion until the trial started.

If things get out of hand again we will close this thread.

Just because someone might think George Zimmerman is innocent does not make them a racist.

Just because someone thinks Trayvon Martin was killed in cold blood does not make them a racist.

Here are the rules on posting on Websleuths. I would suggest you read them and if you have any questions you can email me at tgrif@xmission.com

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159"]The Rules - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

Thank you Harmony2 for finding the live streams
Here are some links to live-stream:

http://wildabouttrial.com/george-zimmerman-live-stream.html

http://www.wptv.com/generic/news/national/George-Zimmerman-trial-complete-coverage

http://www.wesh.com/news/central-fl...ed-coverage/watch-george-zimmerman-trial-live

Thank you for being a part of Websleuths.

Tricia Griffith
Co-Owner Websleuths.com
Live audio WDBO Orlando

http://www.news965.com/
 
OK EVERYONE,

WE ARE GOING TO PLAY NICE TODAY CORRECT?

PLEASE REMEMBER TO PUT "IN MY OPINION" OR "IMO" IN YOUR POSTS IF THE POST IS NOT A KNOWN FACT OR DOES NOT HAVE A LINK TO BACK IT UP.

I have had very little sleep which tends to make me cranky. Please be nice so I don't need to pull out my cranky and use it on you.

Love and kisses,
Tricia
 
Morning Tricia!!!
Thanks for the opportunity of a new start today!!

Watching the hearing now with my coffee and toasted bagel... :)

I am gathering this is the prosecutions rebuttal to that hearing? Something they don't like that came out last night??

Good Morning!
 
Anyone else think that GZ may have dropped a few pounds? This morning he looks a little lighter to me..

JMO
 
Anyone else think that GZ may have dropped a few pounds? This morning he looks a little lighter to me..

JMO

Now that you mention it - yes, he does look a bit lighter. I bet he's not sleeping well or feeling much of an appetite since the commencement of the trial. He always looks sleepy to me.
 
I would say it looks like he may have dropped about 25 lbs... His neck looks much smaller to me..

I think he is under such stress that he is like you said, Most likely not sleeping well and possibly on meds.

There is nothing good about this case. His life is touched and ruined no matter what. TM is dead.

It is just a horrible tragedy.. OMO
 
'Morning, is this the 'Daubert' hearing they were talking about yesterday?

Im not sure. To me is sounds like a hearing to see IF a dauber hearing is needed..


AND Completely my own thoughts.. .Anyone else keep thinking of Dauber from Coach??? ;)

OMO
 
Anyone see Crump this morning On NEW DAY?

He said that whose voice it was on the tape is not the crux of the case...

I thought that was their position from the beginning???

OMO
 
For a recap, MOM said that the ME from the state said the range of the shot was .4 mm to 4 ft away...

This man, I am not sure of his title, I missed it.. Says he thinks it is 2-4 inches away.

That makes sense along with the evidence so far to me... OMO
 
Good morning all!

I was very active during the CA trial but have been quiet since then. I've been watching the GZ trial from the beginning so I've decided to jump back into this wonderful forum. Bear with me, I'm a little rusty :)
 
After reading and listening to yesterdays events from last night, I find it very hard to see how the state is going to get their conviction. This case, more than any other case I can remember, is so ripe with reasonable doubt that one wonders how it's even at trial. Here are some examples:

Screaming on the 911 call - I'm not sure there is anyone that can definitively say who that is on the call. Everyone has their theory, but nothing conclusive. And if your not conclusive that it was TM, that's reasonable doubt (benefits the defense)

Who the aggressor was - At this point there is no conclusive evidence that I've seen that shows definitively who started the fight or even how the fight got started. We have testimony from one person (RJ) who may or may not be believable. That's reasonable doubt (benefits the defense).

IMO, in order to convict, you have to believe every single word of what RJ said and then ignore evidence to the contrary (grass stains on GZ back, injuries, etc).
 
About GZ's weight. I thought that yesterday but by the end of the day he looked big again. Odd that you would mention that this morning as I was going to see if the same thing happens today :)
 
Daniel Shoemaker is a forensic crime scene reconstruction specialist.
 
IMO, this is an unpopular belief but I am of a few who honestly believe there are two separate and distinct voices yelling and then crying out for help. The last few we hear, at the very end, IMO is TM.

Beyond that, I have a theory on why GZ would call for help but my opininion is unfavorable to the defendant. So, I will leave it at that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
226
Guests online
287
Total visitors
513

Forum statistics

Threads
608,537
Messages
18,240,774
Members
234,392
Latest member
FamilyGal
Back
Top