West could not codify it.
Typically, there are no codifications of those things which are perfectly legal. jmo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
West could not codify it.
The yellow spot is the location of his body when police arrived.
There is no eye witness that saw Trayvon at his Dad's house.
Some believe BY meant AT. It did not. It meant BY. Why would a conversation take place telling him to "run" if he was already AT?
You bet there will be an appeal. MOO.
But assault is. Key point. Zimmerman was attacked at the T where he dropped his keys.
What is with the word 'daddy' in reference to TM's father? Is it yet another way to portray TM as a small kid or a term often used by his family?
I am not a lawyer, but I've worked for them. The definition of lesser included says:Are there any legal professionals who can explain how the pros. could add a charge now? Wouldn't this potentially have changed the defense's arguments, etc? How do you defend/have a fair trial against a charge added at the last minute?
It is the exact wording given in court testimony and therefore legal and appropiate. You cannot change the wording of a witness' testimony.IMO
Asking 'what are you doing here' is not against the law and not reason to assault someone.
"BY" as stated by an ear witness, not an eye witness or "AT"
Who besides GZ testified they saw GZ was attacked at the T?
I believe he dropped his keys to unholster his weapon and use two hands to slide the barrel, loading the gun with a bullet into the chamber.
or to later to fabricate the crime scene evidence
No TRAYVON puts himself at his daddys house..
EVIDENCE
Is anyone else overwhelmed by the irony of the state trying to claim child abuse when the "child" was the one assaulting the defendant? JMO. OMO. MOO.
It's suspicious because the same people say TM was afraid when the evidence does not bear that out. Not one pro-supported can explain how it's possible that TM could be in the back of his fathers house, talking to RJ and then wind up near the T. RJ never testified she heard running away or anything like that, she heard a scuffle. There is a 2 minute gap in RJ's testimony, what was TM doing during all that time if he was scared? Walking in a circle? Not according to RJ, he was in the back of his fathers house.
Does anyone else find it ironic that the state that could not convict Casey Anthony of child abuse is now going to go after GZ on that charge?
That angle is very misleading! Look at the actual maps, crime scene photos and watch the walk thru with George & police on YouTube. The body is much closer to the T than this angle shows. I'm not trying to be difficult, but you are looking at some very "skewed" information from people who are trying to make it look like the body was half way down the path and simple facts show that he wasn't. Brandy Green's home was all the way at the other end. He was not standing next to his home when this happened.
IMO