Mahouston69
Digital Imaging Specialist
Against what? TM had no injuries from the fight. IN MY OPINION
Defending himself from being shot, stabbed, kidnapped, robbed.
In this case was a reasonable and substanciated fear.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Against what? TM had no injuries from the fight. IN MY OPINION
An interesting position and I see your point.
This is what I would have done.
Created the case around GZ misleading the investigation with his account.
Finding or accounting for the missing minutes between the 911 call and GZ's 911 call.
Disprove his account on the way GZ said he shot TM. Use the trajectory of the bullet to showing how the gun was positioned.
----------------------------
Side note: A one shot kill is a controlled shot.
This case really makes you think and I mean that seriously. imo
An interesting position and I see your point.
This is what I would have done.
Created the case around GZ misleading the investigation with his account.
Finding or accounting for the missing minutes between the 911 call and GZ's 911 call.
Disprove his account on the way GZ said he shot TM. Use the trajectory of the bullet to showing how the gun was positioned.
----------------------------
Side note: A one shot kill is a controlled shot.
Defending himself from being shot, stabbed, kidnapped, robbed.
In this case was a reasonable and substanciated fear.
MOM!
Someone read their text messages saying SOS
![]()
qwerty2013, prolly the best definition or analogy for circumstantial evidence that I have come across is;
'If you go to bed at night and there is no snow on the ground. Yet, when you wake up the next morning and peer out the window to see that there is an accumulation of snow on the ground.'
"It snowed during the night"...
Is pulling back or drawing the bow against the law? IMO
Really? You would behave dishonestly to avoid the consequences of your actions? I wouldn't. And I don't believe that GZ did.
Defending himself from being shot, stabbed, kidnapped, robbed.
In this case was a reasonable and substanciated fear.
I agree that RJ's behavior after the call disconnected and all the way up to this trial is suspect. IMO the guilt she said she felt was not brought on by simply "being the last person to talk" with TM. It seems more logical that her guilt was come from some greater knowledge of what transpired.We have to agree to disagree. TM was no child. I wish the truth of RJ was known. IMO, and only my opinion, I speculate she egged TM on. She feels guilty, did not call to find out why she hadn't heard fom him, did not attend funeral because of said guilt, and did not tell the truth on the stand.
OMO.
OMG....what do you think Trayvon was doing....dancing?....oh, never mind....carry on.
IMO
John Good said on the stand that he only saw fists moving never saw them actually connect.
"Dishonesty"? You are making some insulting assumptions while I was describing a *purely hypothetical* situation. What if I were framed by criminals or corrupt cops? Anyway, my point was, regardless of the circumstances, if I were to find myself in a situation such that punching or slamming myself to create some injury on my person would get me out of jail, especially a life sentence, I would definitely do it.
10-30 years in jail or a bloody nose and some bruises that don't need medical attention. Is that so difficult to choose?
IMO
Yep, I have been thinking alot about assuming a persons actions such a following when they may have a legitimate reason for what they are actually doing. Theres a lot of "you better think about it" things connected with this case. IMOI makes me think about getting my CCL & carrying a weapon just in the case I am confronted, taunted & beaten by ANY ONE in my personal space. End of times, friends! Gotta protect ourselves, right?!