Germany/Portugal - Christian Brueckner, 27 @ time of 1st crime (2004), charged with sexual assault crimes, Praia de Rocha, Portugal. #5

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Disagree. The MO Diane described, the MO Hazel described & the accounts of what the witnesses saw on tape are all very similar. That’s before we even get in to what CB wrote about & what he apparently said to his ex cell-mate.

One can look at the totality or one can attempt to argue every circumstance in isolation. This is polarising because of the point of view behind it.

The issue is - even though I was at the biscuit tin each of the 10 times, my wife can’t prove it was me. Highly unlikely my presence was 10 isolated coincidences but perhaps not enough for my wife to be able to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. That doesn’t mean I didn’t eat all the biscuits. :-)
the problem is the two witnesses who claimed they saw what they did on the tapes - one committed perjury during this trial and the other admitted they did in the 2019 trial which brings their supposed evidence into question tbh. You also have the fact that one at least had different versions apparently from the original statement and the other seemed a hostile witness.
 
I agree in part. That’s the nature of cold case, especially in absence of forensics.

I think it’s likely the judges may go with the defence & then we’ll move to debating conflating legally innocent with factually innocent. Which is good sleuth(y) debating.
I don’t think they’ll make their move in the MM case until any appeals have ended.

The 30-50% chance he’d reoffend within 2 years alarms me. Away from the typical back & fourths -From a pro-victim perspective I am hoping that this all ends in an indeterminate prison sentence because I think the risk is very high. I also think that will also increase the prospect of a full MM confession within the next few years.
This is only the opinion of a single person who had no contact with CB. It may or may not be valid. I would prefer to see the opinions of a wider group of experts, rather than just one.

I shall not be debating or disputing the judge's decision, whatever it may be.
 
Last edited:
Apart from which, describing the Defence as attacking - attacking! - the witnesses is beyond comical and indicates a complete lack of understanding as to what the role of the defence is in a trial.

Back in the real world, questioning and holding up to the light witness statements and testimony is the job the defence is there to do. As most of us know and accept as part of the process of justice being served. And that's exactly what they did.
Interesting differing viewpoints on the role of the defence in this particular trial.

I vehemently disagree that the role of the defence is to systematically dismantle the character of the witness.

By all means tear the evidence to shreds but do please make the progression into the more enlightened techniques now adopted when grilling a survivor of aggravated rape.

The treatment meted out to HB as she presented her case for justice is no part of the process to achieve that. What a shame that was the best presentation they could muster.
My opinion
 
This is only the opinion of a single person who had no contact with CB. It may or may not be valid. I would prefer to see the opinions of a wider group of experts, rather than just one.

I shall not be debating or disputing the judge's decision, whatever it may be.
The defence are free to call an equally eminent rebuttal witness to the stand.
 
No one is going to be found legally innocent. It’s just not a thing.
 
Wednesday, October 2nd:
*Trial continues (Day 36) (@ 9am CET) – Germany/Portugal - Hazel Behan (20 @ time/now 40) (in her home, June 16, 2004, Praia de Rocha on the Algarve coast, 10 miles from Praia de Luz, Portimao, Portugal) - *Christian Stefan Brückner (Bruekner) (27 @ time of 1st crime (2004)/45/now 47) charged (Oct. 11, 2022) with sexual assault (suspect held a knife & brutally raped her. The accused then tied & gagged the woman to a table & raped her again. He then whipped the victim on the back with a whip he had brought with him & finally forcibly performed oral sex with the victim. The accused filmed large parts of the events with a video camera he had brought with him). Braunschweig Regional District Court
Germany/Portugal – *Charged (Oct. 11, 2022) & arrest warrant reinstated 11/18/22 - a 14 year old teenager (unknown victim) (on tape: assaulted/hit the naked girl with a whip. Said to have brutally forced the girl to have oral sex. The accused also videotaped this act). Took place between Dec. 28, 2000 to April 8, 2006 on the Praia da Luz, Algarve coast, Portugal.
Germany/Portugal - *Charged (Oct. 11, 2022) & arrest warrant reinstated 11/18/22 - an elderly woman 70-80 yrs old (unknown victim) a Tour Rep (tied up & raped the victim in her holiday apt. He then hit the victim several times with a whip. The accused is said to have recorded the entire event with a video camera). Took place around the same time (between Dec. 28, 2000 to April 8, 2006) on the Praia de Luz, Algarve coast, Portugal.
Germany/Portugal – *Charged (Oct. 11, 2022) & arrest warrant reinstated 11/18/22 - 10 year old German girl (Joana E.) (wearing only shoes & otherwise naked. He grabbed the child's wrist & began to perform masturbation movements on his naked penis). On Salema (Zalema) beach, near Praia de Luz, Portugal, April 7, 2007).
Germany/Portugal – *Charged (Oct. 11, 2022) & arrest warrant reinstated 11/18/22 – Ines VP (11 year old Portuguese girl) (pulled down his trousers & underpants & made masturbation movements on his naked penis in order to sexually arouse himself, until the frightened girl ran to her father for help. The suspect was arrested on the spot by the Portuguese police). Exposed himself in playpark, São Bartolomeu de Messines, June 11, 2017).
Trial began on February 16, 2024. (And continued on Feb. 23rd, Mar. 1st & 14th, Apr. 2nd, 10th, 12th, 17th, 19th, 24th & 26th, May 2nd, 15th, 166th, 17th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd, 28th, 29th & June 4th & 5th & 28th, July 5th, August 5th, 15th, Sept. 5th & 6th, 25th, 26th).
Next Trial dates: October 2, 7, 8, 21 & Oct. 22, 2024.
Presiding Judge Dr. Engemann. Lead Prosecutor Ute Lindermann. Defense attorneys Dr. Friedrich Fülscher, Philipp Marquort, Dennis Bock & Atilla Aykac.
Brueckner is currently serving a 7 year sentence for the 2005 rape on a pensioner; was sentenced in 2019. Release in Spring or Summer of 2026.

Case info & charges & Brueckner info from June 1, 2020 thru Jan. 18, 2024 & Trial Day 1-34 (Feb. 16 thru Sept. 26) reference post #233 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...imes-praia-de-rocha-portugal-5.722126/page-12

September 27, 2024. Thursday, Day 35 [corrected the Day #s per articles]: Dr. Christian Riedemann, forensic psychiatric expert [is chief physician & head of the Bad Rehburg enforcement center]. Trial continues on Wednesday, October 2nd.
For more info see posts #234 to 237 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...imes-praia-de-rocha-portugal-5.722126/page-12
Additional notes:

*Among other things, he was instructed to examine whether, in the case of the conviction of Christian B. for one or more acts, the prerequisites of paragraphs 66 of the Criminal Code were met.
Security custody: Requirements of § 66 StGB:
The order of custody according to § 66 para. 1 StGB is permissible under the following conditions, all of which must be met: Someone is currently sentenced to a prison sentence of at least two years for a crime specified in § 66 (1) StGB. The perpetrator has already been sentenced to a prison sentence of at least one year twice in the past for such an act. He has already served at least two years in prison because of these old acts or was in the prison deprivation of liberty. Preventive custody always presupposes that the convicted person has a tendency to commit serious crimes & represents a danger to the general public at the time of his conviction.

*With the report of the expert, the procedure turns onto the home straight. Next Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2024 there will be an appointment for decisions about applications. From the Chamber's point of view, however, we all had witnesses, said the judge. If there are no surprises, the taking of evidence is nearing completion. A plea would be possible in the second week of October.
*Proceedings before the 2nd Criminal Division in connection with five offenses against sexual self-determination. Possibly end of the taking of evidence on October 2nd, 2024, followed by the prosecutor's plea. The 2nd Criminal Division indicates that the taking of evidence could possibly be closed on October 2nd, 2024 - subject to any further motions for evidence & decisions on motions for evidence that are still pending. The prosecutor's plea could then follow.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
63
Guests online
1,581
Total visitors
1,644

Forum statistics

Threads
605,622
Messages
18,189,856
Members
233,471
Latest member
Hunter2_1
Back
Top