GUILTY - Tammy Moorer trial for Kidnapping Heather Elvis, 8 Oct 2018 #4

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
@TTF14

IMO, they go hand-in-hand. The outcome of this case is really going to effect SMs.

Kidnapping


SECTION 16-3-910. Kidnapping.

Whoever shall unlawfully seize, confine, inveigle, decoy, kidnap, abduct or carry away any other person by any means whatsoever without authority of law, except when a minor is seized or taken by his parent, is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be imprisoned for a period not to exceed thirty years unless sentenced for murder as provided in Section 16-3-20.

HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 16-91; 1952 Code Section 16-91; 1942 Code Section 1122; 1937 (40) 137; 1966 (54) 2151; 1974 (58) 2361; 1976 Act No. 684; 1991 Act No. 117, Section 1.

Conspiracy to kidnap

SECTION 16-3-920. Conspiracy to kidnap.

If two or more persons enter into an agreement, confederation, or conspiracy to violate the provisions of Section 16-3-910 and any of such persons do any overt act towards carrying out such unlawful agreement, confederation, or conspiracy, each such person shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, shall be punished in like manner as provided for the violation of Section 16-3-910.

HISTORY: 1962 Code Section 16-92; 1952 Code Section 16-92; 1942 Code Section 1122; 1937 (40) 137; 1991 Act No. 117, Section 1.

Code of Laws - Title 16 - Chapter 3 - Offenses Against The Person
 
"Would it surprise you that when my ex-wife's house burned down that I was questioned and read my rights?"'

"Well, I'm not surprised you have an ex-wife..."
BBM:
th
Good One!!!
 
TM's fingers are slim (I noticed this when there was a closeup one time). I was also the person who noticed she wasn't wearing her wedding ring day 1 of trial.

I was surprised that someone with her heft had maintained slim hands and fingers. I don't think it's a matter of a wedding ring not fitting. She's been this size for years, the exception being the months she remained slim after jail, but that was only a matter of months.
 
TM's fingers are slim (I noticed this when there was a closeup one time). I was also the person who noticed she wasn't wearing her wedding ring day 1 of trial.

I was surprised that someone with her heft had maintained slim hands and fingers. I don't think it's a matter of a wedding ring not fitting. She's been this size for years, the exception being the months she remained slim after jail, but that was only a matter of months.

I noticed that too! So, I agree, I don't think it's because it doesn't fit.

Now, did she have to hawk it for money to pay bills because there is no way anyone would ever hire her again? Maybe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
187
Guests online
1,626
Total visitors
1,813

Forum statistics

Threads
606,690
Messages
18,208,282
Members
233,929
Latest member
kezzx
Back
Top