Halyna Hutchins Shot With Prop Gun - Alec Baldwin indicted & Hannah Gutierrez-Reed charged, 2021 #8

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

In pre-trial motions, Baldwin’s lawyers slammed the type of testing conducted by state investigators, arguing that because the gun was destroyed, it deprived Baldwin’s team of the ability to recreate the FBI testing procedures that concluded the firearm could not be fired without pulling the trigger.

Baldwin previously told CNN he never pulled the trigger on the gun, and the actor’s legal team is expected to seize on the testing procedures when it’s their turn to cross-examine the witness this morning.

 
Moonstrawbs said:
In pre-trial motions, Baldwin’s lawyers slammed the type of testing conducted by state investigators, arguing that because the gun was destroyed, it deprived Baldwin’s team of the ability to recreate the FBI testing procedures that concluded the firearm could not be fired without pulling the trigger.

Baldwin previously told CNN he never pulled the trigger on the gun, and the actor’s legal team is expected to seize on the testing procedures when it’s their turn to cross-examine the witness this morning.

Click to expand...
Amazing how a false statement by one party lives for ever on the internet. The gun WAS NOT destroyed! It was presented in court yesterday!

Legal rules really need to address this type of falsehood, imo.
 
katykat said:
I don't see how this trial is going to complete in nine days. Absolutely constant interruptions.
Click to expand...
I'm watching Runkle's livestream (I like him but I think he talks just a tad too much) and it seems utterly chaotic, to be honest. Lots of stuff yesterday which should have been sorted weeks ago - like who gets letters and who gets numbers for their exhibits, ffs people!!

Still seems to me that his defence are just waaay off with what they are dredging up. And, once again, Spiro has the unmitigated audacity to describe the gun as having been "destroyed". Sorry but that is just an outright lie and needs to be stepped on by the court or whatever his regulating authority is.
 
Angenette Levy on the Law & Crime feed (during the break) said a juror handed a note for the judge….she said it could have been about a bathroom break…

AB looked like he maybe needed a break for that too…..


ETA: given this loooong sidebar, maybe something else?
 
Last edited:
I'm so glad to see Spiro using the big white board to illustrate the testimony for the jurors, sure wish AJ had done so in the Read trial, esp. in closings, I think it would have been an immense help to the jury.
 
Marantz4250b said:
Amazing how a false statement by one party lives for ever on the internet. The gun WAS NOT destroyed! It was presented in court yesterday!

Legal rules really need to address this type of falsehood, imo.
Click to expand...
It was damaged in a way that limits certain verbiage from ever being proclaimed.
 
So, I'm watching this Spiro guy questioning the crime scene lady.

Why is it relevant where the live ammo came from?

It was live ammo and it was there. It's irrelevant where it came from as it doesn't change what AB did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 240 more.
Total: 2,366 (members: 241, guests: 2,125)

Online statistics

Members online
241
Guests online
2,125
Total visitors
2,366
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
599,198
Messages
18,091,575
Members
230,810
Latest member
dalto677
Back
Top