jaejae
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2015
- Messages
- 2,879
- Reaction score
- 5,413
The suspect in this case may be a white man. I am not sure who he was but I believe the girl victim when she said he was white. Therefore I do not agree with analysis below it was deception. Before the killer struck he likely allowed the child victim to behave relatively normally as in the case of Amy Milhaljevic where she was allowed to call home. Yes this victim she was abducted but until she was killed I believe the killer tried to reassure in a sick and twisted was by saying he would take her back. I do not believe the child would have been capable of lying for him and these facts may have been a kind of taunting by him:
Clearly the references to a “white man” and “Virginia” were deception. No serial killer would allow his victim to give out actual useful clues to the family and authorities. If anything, this should have helped investigators narrow their search to not include white suspects or residents in Virginia. But at the time, the concept of a serial killer was unknown. You had repeat offenders, but the phrase “serial killer” was years away from these crimes.
Podcast Tantamount Episode Two Supplemental Material – Body Count
Clearly the references to a “white man” and “Virginia” were deception. No serial killer would allow his victim to give out actual useful clues to the family and authorities. If anything, this should have helped investigators narrow their search to not include white suspects or residents in Virginia. But at the time, the concept of a serial killer was unknown. You had repeat offenders, but the phrase “serial killer” was years away from these crimes.
Podcast Tantamount Episode Two Supplemental Material – Body Count