Turnadot
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2007
- Messages
- 3,763
- Reaction score
- 4
I agree. Remember during a pre-trial hearing when Baez asked GA what lengths he would go to in order to save KC? GA indicated he'd do anything at all. Anything.my snip!
I saw that too...but I saw a different reason. I believe ICA's devastation was caused by the fact that GA did NOT fall on the sword for her. her entire defense rested on him - her only way out was to believe GA was serious on the stand that time he said I will do anything to save my daughter
and he didnt take the fall. he told the truth to save himself and for caylee.
now she has to take the stand on her own, and be shredded by the state and the jury will never, ever fall for it. had GA corroborated caylee's "drowning"....ICA might indeed have walked free. not now.
My personal opinion is that Baez was testing the waters then, and based upon GA's answer, Baez believed GA would fall on his sword, so crafted his opening statement on abuse. But then GA got on the stand and refused to be labeled a child molester.
Baez's entire cross yesterday was damage control. He needed the jury to still consider that KC was sexually abused by GA. That's why he went outside the scope; he had to. I doubt the jury bought it because GA managed to be convincing. Did GA abuse KC? I doubt it, but even if he did, he was convincing enough on the stand when he said he didn't. I really don't think Baez expected GA to stand up for himself and Caylee.