HI HI - Waianae, Honolulu Co., UnkMale 7-10, UP2157, unknown circumstances, July 2000

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

lightofmine99

♞Ⅸ
Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
1,456
Reaction score
11,278
Waianae John Doe (2000)
a.k.a "Little Waianae John Doe"
UP2157 (NU)
Original.jpg
Circumstances:
Unknown. Possibly mongoloid/Asiatic descent including Polynesians, Native Americans and East Asians. (per NamUs).

Case Numbers:
  • Doe Network: N/A
  • NamUs: UP2157
  • ME/C: 00-0794
  • NCMEC: N/A
Overview:
  • Location: Waianae, Hawaii. (Honolulu Co.)
  • Date Body Found: July 29, 2000
  • NamUs Created: June 26, 2008.
  • Tribal Land: NO.
  • PMI: UNKNOWN
    • Est. Year of Death: 0-2000.
  • State of Remains: Not recognizable - Partial remains with soft tissues.
    • Torso not recovered
    • One or more limbs not recovered
    • One or both hands not recovered
  • Cause of Death: UNKNOWN
Physical:
  • Sex: Male
  • Race/Ethnicity: Uncertain, poss. Asian, Polynesian, Native American.
  • Age: 7-10 (pre-adolescent).
  • Height: CANNOT ESTIMATE
  • Weight: CANNOT ESTIMATE
  • Hair: N/A
  • Eye: N/A
Identifiers:
  • Dentals: UNKNOWN
  • DNA: UNKNOWN
  • Prints: UNKNOWN
  • Marks / Features: N/A
Personal Affects:
  • Clothing: NONE
  • Jewelry: NONE
  • Add'l Items: NONE
Links:
NamUs: UP2157 (ARCHIVE)
Doe Network: N/A


Notes:
This John Doe can be found on the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) website but he does not have a specific I.D. number listed.
 
Notes:
This John Doe can be found on the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) website but he does not have a specific I.D. number listed.
I must not be searching correctly and don't see him on NCMEC - how did you find him on NCMEC?
 
Thanks lightofmine99! I didn't realize they did recons without having the case on their site. The recon on Namus does say uploaded yesterday, so maybe that will be forthcoming. I recall bones being found (somewhat regularly, actually) in caves in Hawaii; part of the ancient/traditional burial. It would be interesting and perhaps helpful to know the circumstances of the recovery. Given ruleouts of male and female, they likely have DNA on file - I hope so.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
153
Guests online
3,857
Total visitors
4,010

Forum statistics

Threads
602,587
Messages
18,143,149
Members
231,446
Latest member
VAres67
Back
Top