Orgona
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 13, 2012
- Messages
- 968
- Reaction score
- 7,890
I understand, and I don't dismiss the idea that the defense is making claims that aren't true.
But keep in mind that there is a difference between
(a) the evidence that was presented to the grand jury to get an indictment, and
(b) the evidence (if any) that has been presented to the defense so far
(c) and based on his statements, Beres isn't even sure of what the GJ was given, much less what the defense has been provided.
Yes, I'm aware all of the above.
NB is not a member of the defense or the prosecution, so I'm not expecting him to know everything about the case. That would be naive. I'm even surprised he came to know something the other journalists did not.
But he promises to share some details about the case he thinks are new to the general public. I'm not expecting anything more than that and he wasn't promising anything more than that either.
It wouldn't be the first case someone has an inside scoop on a case, but it wouldn't be the first time if we won't hear anything new to us either. We will see. I still think if this turns out to be correct, then it's more likely he was able to see some documents from the circle of someone who is in no state to testify anymore.
I hope I can find it on the website tomorrow, as by the time it will air I'll be most likely sound asleep here. Any link would be appreciated.