I'll stick by what I have said along. Without a death certificate no Tennessee jury will convict them of capitol murder. The video is meaningless as obliviously the DA's office coached her on exactly what to say to not criminalize herself with perjury with the words
'looked like' followed by 'I think it was' if I'm hearing her correctly. All of this leads to the same thing-try to turn the defendants against each other and confess by blaming each other. It's really all they have had all along. If you really compare the circumstantial evidence as shown it is weak it's self.
They can't place them at the crime scene because there is no crime scene. Strike one.
They can't physically attach them to the murder weapon because there is no murder weapon. Strike two.
They can't physically attach them to the victim because there is no victim. Strike three.
There are no witnesses to the crime because no crime has been committed in the eyes of the law. Strike four.
No fathom video is going to change those facts regardless of what is on it. If they had any of these four connectable things they would not be playing hide the tubesteak and shuffle out all these games with the media about some video that is meaningless in the first place. It seems like everything they do is aimed at the media-specifically-and I'm not the only one noticing that-their potential jury is as well.
This is not the TBI I know and I'm quite sure(real sure) they had nothing to do with the indictments and have known all along that hearsay, speculation and a promise of a confession was used to convince the grand jury to return a true bill.
Well, they are stuck with it now. You can't really blame the media for just following them along on this seemingly endless attempts to convince someone that someone is guilty for this crime. Problem being I don't think they have convinced themselves=and that makes it difficult to convince others if you don't believe it yourself.
My opinions only, no facts here:
Yes, a grand jury indicts, but a jury convicts. There is a big difference.
Of course, for the tens of thousands indicted in the U.S. every year, but found not guilty in a jury trial at a later date:
They will be bankrupted by legal fees.
Their reputations will be permanently damaged.
They will find it difficult to get a job OR a passport.
I personally believe that the grand jury system needs to be revised to the extent that it becomes as difficult to obtain a grand jury indictment as it does to obtain a conviction by jury.
This does not mean that the grand juries do not have it right in the Holly Bobo case. But skepticism is not irrational.
I still think that ONE person is principally responsible for the disappearance of Holly Bobo, and that person knows precisely where she can be found. If one of the current suspects or POI's or witnesses can deliver that simple information, then the authorities are on the right track.
