Just finished reading BeanE's latest entry here:
http://casesignal.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/hailey-dunn-message-from-peter-kampfer/
Wowee wow wow!
Looks like we need to re-name this thread!
So he did not confirm she is cleared....interesting.
Just finished reading BeanE's latest entry here:
http://casesignal.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/hailey-dunn-message-from-peter-kampfer/
Wowee wow wow!
Looks like we need to re-name this thread!
Just finished reading BeanE's latest entry here:
http://casesignal.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/hailey-dunn-message-from-peter-kampfer/
Wowee wow wow!
Looks like we need to re-name this thread!
Just finished reading BeanE's latest entry here:
http://casesignal.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/hailey-dunn-message-from-peter-kampfer/
Wowee wow wow!
Looks like we need to re-name this thread!
:waitasec: Why would we need to rename the thread based on this. Kampfer doesn't state Billie has not been cleared? Maybe I missed something but I just read what was on the link. He states that SA is one of the POI's but he does not mention BD at all. We can assume she maybe one of the several but it's not stated or known as a fact.
:couch:
He has mentioned several POI's before. Several, really? Doesn't several mean around 7? A few means around 3 etc. That's alot of POI's.
IMO, a few and several just means simply more than 2. I believe these words are often used interchangeably. Now, had he said "many," I think that would have suggested more than 3!
My money is on 3 POIs---that's "plenty"!
Yep...."I seen a 3" too.
I think the wording included "in the disappearance of her daughter". Maybe she is not ruled out completely, as far as possible other factors, obstruction, etc? I am just guessing.
I'm not sure what to make of PK's reply to Bean E. IMO it could go either way, as he did not answer her question, but repeated what we already have heard many times. SA is a POI and there are others (POI) being looked at as well.
It would be helpful if LE would give a case status PC. When was the last time PK or any other LEO gave an on-camera interview?
My money's on 2. "A few" is a phrase I would likely choose if it were 2.
I would know saying "1" may lead people to believe, under the current climate, that someone else had been cleared, when they hadn't, and lead to taking off the pressure I wanted on that person.
Saying "2" would cause more frenzy in a public that currently already is frenzied, and may lead to danger for those two people.
"A few" is not too big, not too small, but just right.
It lets the public know there're more than one, so I keep my obligation regarding the public trust, but remains just vague enough to keep disaster at bay, keeping my obligation to public safety (particularly if I hadn't issued a single warning to the public about protecting their children).
I'd say he answered BeanE's question by NOT answering her question.
He could have easily cleared up the confusion over Billie's status as a POI, and chose to, ironically in true BD fashion, to skirt the issue.
Can you think of a good reason PK would avoid stating she has been cleared, if that is indeed the case?
I do agree that a case update would be helpful - at least to us. But something tells me LE is being extremely careful not to tip their hand at this point.
BBM
I don't agree with that. :floorlaugh: I think she very much is and LE is playing games.