I'm not sure about Indiana specifically but often in a bench trial there is a written verdict, much like an opinion, which lays out all the facts and evidence that the judge used to arrive at the verdict. With a jury it is "guilty" or "not guilty" and unless jurors talk after the verdict there is no way to know the reasoning.Me too. Not why it's taking a week for the verdict to be read. Maybe one of the attorneys couldn't be available until then.
One issue with the written verdict is that it lays out reasoning that can be attacked on appeal (unlike a jury verdict). So I'm hoping that the judge wants an airtight, appeal-proof written verdict which would require carefully reviewing of evidence, research of applicable law plus some time to write. I'm happy to wait for that! Crossing my fingers from LWOP for this piece of $h*t.
MOO as an attorney who does not practice in Indiana.