That makes sense i didn't actually think of those, so the marker lights are set to not go off if you have them on like that? or do they have an automatic shutoff after some time? Do we know if those were on when the truck was found? I may have to get on some videos and see what his would of been like the main reason i ask is if they were off either David or someone else turned them off and since it was in the daytime then they wouldnt need those therefore maybe it would of been untounched.(please school me if I'm wrong lol.. @OldAce ) maybe thats one of the things they sent back for investigation
So if you have to turn the on and off... then would it be required to have them on while driving? Funny how these cases get you i found myself paying attention to marker lights today while driving, so im thinking the answer would be yes, which would mean if so then the mechanic and sara would of had to touch them to drive it back. My train of though was with so many in the truck that may be the one thing that could possibly not be compromised by other prints.
Most states say have them on an hour before sundown till an hour after sunrise or similar.
it was a female officer that used Dave's cell to notify SS the truck was located. That officer is the one who should have questioned SS. IMO.
I've got no clue which deputy on that dept would have been the best to interview the wife and I'm not going to 2nd guess the Sac County Sheriff. None of us know how the events unfolded that day or how assignments were made.
Ita.
Eh. I don't know. If you watch the interview with him it's easy to see why Sarah feels the way she does.
Would you though if you had a gnawing suspicion in the back of your mind that you might not like the answer to that question? Seems to me that SS can only accept the "foul play" angle. Might be tough to answer questions that contradict what she wants to believe.Ita.
Still... I'd be willing to answer whatever, if it meant finding out what happened to David.
Everything else would be secondary.
Omo.
Right, I know they said that but if the mechanic checked the truck, and they were not doing finger prints, then I dont understand what they were looking for. I guess maybe drug residue or blood maybe just, funny to think youd go through all of that and not do prints
I wasn’t convinced by his reasoning. Cases get solved by fingerprints all the time. Just the other day, a robber was caught because the police saw on security footage that the robber had picked up an Amazon package in the lobby of the building, and then dusted that package for fingerprints. Think about how many unknown people might have touched the cardboard box of an Amazon package. Yet it worked.
Well they came back and got the truck after the found it, from the mechanic, there is a video about it. And they said for investigation, so if they didnt do prints it just makes me wonder what they could of been looking for is all. Drugs, blood maybe, you would think that would be routine stuff, I just remember them saying they did send some stuff back to the lab and if its not prints what would it be, not that they'd tell us right away anyway due to the investigation, but that part bugs me, if they went through taking it, and did send stuff back, I guess from the outside looking in it just seems odd to me that prints wouldn't be apart of it. I forget what interview it was at the end he said they'd sent some stuff back for analysis, ill try to find it today.
@tarabull yeah, definitely think you're right on the prints, it just does not sit right, I did find the interview, but its not the OG its a clip in another video and they refer to the one where the detective is talking, he says "forenisic? we have done search warrants and taken ITEMS out to be investigated for evidence. And then outright says no they did not do fingerprints"
