I'm open to the bikes being staged too, but ONLY if the perp is local. If it is a random sex offender who just got off the freeway - he has no reason to stage the bikes. He would either take them or leave them where he took the girls. However, if a local came out of his house, lured the girls inside, and then subdued them is the perp -- he HAD TO stage the bikes -- to get them off of his driveway!!
Good point, Jaime. I agree that only a person who is local would need to stage the bikes. Unless the person would be associated with the abduction site, I doubt an abductor would take the time or feel the need to do that.
Staging the bikes takes time and increases the risk of being seen doing it. A non-local pedophile would have what he wanted and be on his way out of the area as fast as possible.
But, if the abductor is local and, as you say, if the bikes are on his driveway or at his job site, he'd have to the risk of being seen transporting and placing the bikes.
The problem I have is reconciling the cyclist's account of the bikes being on the path and hours later the bikes being found during the search leaning against the fence.
From the fact that the cyclist had to swerve around them, it sounds like the bikes were lying on the ground. That indicates the girls got off the bikes quickly. It could be that was when the abduction occurred.
Or it could be something entirely innocent--one of the girls spotted a rabbit or something and they jumped off to check it out. After the cyclist went by the bikes, the girls returned and at some point leaned the bikes against the fence.
It's also possible someone moved the kids' bikes off the path and put them against the fence as a nice way of keeping the trail passable. But I haven't heard of anyone else using the trail saying they moved the bikes.
I don't know! It's so frustrating!