Well, abducting two together seems to happen even though I don't recall the cases. I will look them up - did the perp have guns? The AM case I remember now -
This is so sad for these girls. I remember as a kid living outside of Fortuna, Ca on a small ranch, we roamed everywhere in the forest, rode horses, hiked the hills, and generally just took off with our friends - no meth labs back then or other obvious dangers like todays world. We were let loose to have fun at the river or anyplace else our feet could carry us.
did anyone else hear the RV stuff? I had sound but it was very very faint so I am hoping others heard this portion clearly. What exactly did the reporter ask?
Did anyone here the reporter ask the question about a missing RV?
He said he wouldnt comment on that??
I did hear that didnt I ?
A school aid is not a covered entity or a health care provider according to HIPPA. She would not transmit information in an electronic form in connection with a health transaction that HHS has adopted a standard.
Who is Covered by the Privacy Rule
The Privacy Rule, as well as all the Administrative Simplification rules, apply to health plans, health care clearinghouses, and to any health care provider who transmits health information in electronic form in connection with transactions for which the Secretary of HHS has adopted standards under HIPAA (the covered entities).
http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/summary/index.html
Was it an unethical act? Maybe if it was done with malice, but it's not a federal crime.
I was just responding with an idea as to how it could happen being there are two missing little girls. You never know who is out and about or driving down the road or visiting a movie theater. I don't think there are meth labs about on a nature trail. Surely the trails are monitored regularily and a meth lab would stink to high heaven. I can see a perp hiding in the woods along the trail waiting for a passer by. But, who knows what these crazy *advertiser censored* holes can do especially if it is not the first time. jmo
wth is this RV business about !!!!?????
I don't like where that takes my line of thought.
I am sorry & I know some people are not going to agree with me-but what this LE did is unacceptable to me-They have lost a whole week-when the dogs took them to those woods-I am angry-JMO
OMG this is slightly off topic but I feel I must share. I was watching NG last night (something I usually avoid like the plague) because she was covering this case and wait for it . . .
I actually agreed with her! lol.
But seriously, I did chortle when she kept emphatically stating "OUR OWN investigation has prooved that DM was at his mother's home with his teenage son at the time the girls went missing" over and over each time more adamantly than the last.
as if HLN investigations are somehow more believable and superior to FBI or LE ones.
I agreed with her that the girls were not in the lake. I agree with her that the parents history is not related to the abduction. But NG is just so - so - NG in her delivery that she made me laugh.
I am sorry & I know some people are not going to agree with me-but what this LE did is unacceptable to me-They have lost a whole week-when the dogs took them to those woods-I am angry-JMO
In this case, I agree with this sentiment. While I understand the need for the thorough lake search I for the life of me cannot figure out why they couldn't search the like AND call it a possible abduction. Why wait a whole week? I don't any process or procedure that if LE had considered this case an abduction...they wouldn't have been allowed to search the lake.