CastlesBurning
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2009
- Messages
- 6,565
- Reaction score
- 11,505
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he's alive, I pray he hasn't hurt any other children and that he is spending his time looking over his shoulder to see if LE has figured it out yet.After all this time where is the killer, how does he feel, is he looking over his shoulder or feeling pretty confident he got away with murdering two little girls?
Has his life improved or spiraling out of control?
Does he look the same, has he gained or lost weight, grown/cut/coloured his hair/ facial hair?
Did he move to a different neighbourhood, state, or country?
Does he have other victims, looking for victims, or never wants to kill again?
Did he commit suicide?
speculation, imo.
Personally, I think he’s in prison for another crime. The girls remains were long deteriorated and likely no DNA, so he wasn’t linked to these crimes. Just my opinion.
But they never found the actual murder site, did they?
I don't think so, but IMO there is a good possibility that the murder scene was actually the perpetrator's vehicle. What I'm basing that on is a verified LE commenter on this site who talked about this feature of child abduction murders on a different cold case thread here on Websleuths.
I don't think so, but IMO there is a good possibility that the murder scene was actually the perpetrator's vehicle. What I'm basing that on is a verified LE commenter on this site who talked about this feature of child abduction murders on a different cold case thread here on Websleuths.
I’m interested to know why it’s thought that there is a separate murder scene. If their bodies were found quite a bit a part, to me that points to the location where they were found being the same as where they were killed. Otherwise, you’d think that the perp would arrive at the location with the girls dead in his vehicle, stop, dump them out together at the same time, in the same spot, and move on.
I’m interested to know why it’s thought that there is a separate murder scene. If their bodies were found quite a bit a part, to me that points to the location where they were found being the same as where they were killed. Otherwise, you’d think that the perp would arrive at the location with the girls dead in his vehicle, stop, dump them out together at the same time, in the same spot, and move on.
I can see that if he were abducting one person. Abducting two little girls who are old enough to fight back and murdering both in your vehicle is hard to imagine unless they were both incapacitated. I guess it's possible, but to me it's less likely than a single abduction.
Somehow I thought this was all just idle speculation, I don’t remember reading from an official source that the bodies were intact and easily identifiable and that they were likely stored somewhere. That completely takes me back to my original suspect so scratch my thinking the guy is in prison.rbbm.
CNN.com - Transcripts
''Aired December 06, 2012 - 19:00 ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.''
''LIEBERMAN: That is correct. Police are looking for the primary murder scene.
VELEZ-MITCHELL: I want to stop for a second to go to Mike Brooks, HLN law enforcement analyst. How would authorities be able to deduce, looking at -- and you`re seeing some of the wooded areas. The girls were found about 25 miles north from where the lake where they disappeared in this wooded area, which is sort of a county park. And now we`re hearing from our sources that they were not killed there. How would cops be able to deduce that from looking around the crime scene?
MIKE BROOKS, HLN LAW ENFORCEMENT ANALYST: Well, they`re not finding certain evidence that should be there because they know -- they probably have a pretty good idea of how the girls died, or at least they most likely do, Jane. But they`re -- things they`re seeing there that wouldn`t -- that aren`t there, that would be there if they had been killed right there in that specific area.''
''A couple of things that we know. I`m told by police sources that they were able to make an eyeball identification, meaning looking at the bodies and knowing in their heads that it was these two girls, very, very quickly. I`m told is that it didn`t appear that the bodies had been out exposed to the elements for the four or five months since they went missing. That`s No. 1.
I`m also told that there was some articles of clothing belonging to these two girls found at that scene, as well. And also we did some researching, and there are 18 registered sex offenders within ten miles of this 125-acre camping area. So that is something that law enforcement is looking at, as well.
But really what they`re focusing on is, and there`s the graphic, is the timeline. They need to figure out what happened when and how long these girls had been out in that park.
VELEZ-MITCHELL: Well, Rita Cosby, investigative journalist, I got chills when Jon just said that these bodies had been kept somewhere, and then when they were put there in this wildlife park, they were easily identifiable. I mean, it`s horrifying to think that they were kept in some -- it implies that they were possibly kept in some kind of refrigeration or something that preserved them.''
If they were intact and easily identifiable I hope that also means some usable DNA of the perp was found.Somehow I thought this was all just idle speculation, I don’t remember reading from an official source that the bodies were intact and easily identifiable and that they were likely stored somewhere. That completely takes me back to my original suspect so scratch my thinking the guy is in prison.
Somehow I thought this was all just idle speculation, I don’t remember reading from an official source that the bodies were intact and easily identifiable and that they were likely stored somewhere. That completely takes me back to my original suspect so scratch my thinking the guy is in prison.
In a manner of speaking, the abduction of two children at once by a stranger/predator is so rare that there is not much data to look at to say what is likely compared to the abduction of a single child. I think, though, that the partial profile released by LE in this case states that they think the victims were lured by "quiet coercion" - that's very different from a blitz-style attack where a victim is dragged kicking and screaming to a car. So if LE is right about that, the girls may not have been fighting back until the vehicle was far enough away or in a private enough spot that they could be incapacitated or attacked...they might not have realized the danger they were in until they were already in the car and driven quite far away. Also they were very young and may have been too scared to make a scene, which is, I'm sure, part of what their attacker was counting on when he picked them.
I think for some of these offenders their vehicle is a much more private location than, for example, their home (where other people may come and go, where neighbors can hear what's going on). A vehicle is mobile, can be driven to out of the way places, making it easy to assault a victim or dump a body, and it may actually be easier to control victims in a confined area like a trunk or a backseat.
I suppose. I just can't see this with two girls this age unless they were tied up or drugged.