buffetoflies
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2009
- Messages
- 1,130
- Reaction score
- 45
Found this related article: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/cri...n-victim-didn-prison-abuser-article-1.2793774
First, this part isn't true
Because this thread was started in August of 2013, and he was arrested in March of 2014.
Anyway, the interesting part imo was here
which is scary and mind blowing at the same time.
Also I disagree with this part. I have been watching research presentations about trauma recently (on youtube) and there is a lot of evidence that just the kid doesn't know what's happening, they DO still suffer ill effects years down the road from it because the body remembers.
First, this part isn't true
Police in Ottumwa, roughly 85 miles southeast of Des Moines, arrested Grooms a day after the DHS agents asked for the public's help in locating "John Doe."
Because this thread was started in August of 2013, and he was arrested in March of 2014.
Anyway, the interesting part imo was here
Yet Oldenburger said on Thursday that Grooms had been lured into the molestation. Two child pornographers from New Orleans and Ireland were posing as teens and convincing children like Grooms to perform sex acts on Skype calls they recorded and distributed, he said.
Grooms actually believed he was speaking with a teenage girl, according to Oldenburger. The child pornographers, posing as the girl, told him what he had done was "so hot" and asked him to do more, but he would not commit any more sexual abuse, Oldenburger said.
"The abuse was committed at the behest of two men who had, over a long period of time, perfected a technique for duping children into committing sexual acts that they would not otherwise have engaged in," Oldenburger said.
"They were so skillful and so persuasive in their efforts that they successfully convinced hundreds of children to engage in sexual activity while they surreptitiously recorded it."
which is scary and mind blowing at the same time.
"The child was not injured, no pain was inflicted, and the child was too young to even be aware of what was happening," Oldenburger said. "The child suffered no ill effects as a result of Grooms' actions."
Also I disagree with this part. I have been watching research presentations about trauma recently (on youtube) and there is a lot of evidence that just the kid doesn't know what's happening, they DO still suffer ill effects years down the road from it because the body remembers.