sbsuzilight
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2018
- Messages
- 155
- Reaction score
- 749
I totally agree.That baby may also be considered a victim here.
I totally agree.That baby may also be considered a victim here.
This is not necessarily my opinion, but a conspiracy theorist might say that a family with political ties and immigrant farm workers might slide a few hundred thousand under the table...This is a high profile case that will bring this legal team more publicity than they could ever buy. It will give them professional prestige and bragging rights, no matter the verdict (though how they get there will matter). Up thread, it was pointed out that there was a large, resident Latino population in their home base area. This one case will provide them with a lifetime of Latino clients, and likely farm produce. As a husband/wife team, they can better afford to take this case on as a reduced fee or even pro bono case. Taking this case is simply good business, money is green, and practice building is hard.
"Early to bed, early to rise, work like hell and advertise." B.J. Palmer, Davenport, IA
I still think that you, and others, are seriously underestimating the amount of available money and wealth in the Latino community, and that the family may well be paying to bring this legal team on board. But I will not argue that there are Human/Civil/Immigrant Rights groups that could come forward with deep pockets money as the case progresses. And that's not even considering Hollywood money... Hey, it's a free and capitalistic country, and there might even be a profit motive in paying the family, to provide for CR's defense.
This is a high profile case that will bring this legal team more publicity than they could ever buy. It will give them professional prestige and bragging rights, no matter the verdict (though how they get there will matter). Up thread, it was pointed out that there was a large, resident Latino population in their home base area. This one case will provide them with a lifetime of Latino clients, and likely farm produce. As a husband/wife team, they can better afford to take this case on as a reduced fee or even pro bono case. Taking this case is simply good business, money is green, and practice building is hard.
"Early to bed, early to rise, work like hell and advertise." B.J. Palmer, Davenport, IA
I still think that you, and others, are seriously underestimating the amount of available money and wealth in the Latino community, and that the family may well be paying to bring this legal team on board. But I will not argue that there are Human/Civil/Immigrant Rights groups that could come forward with deep pockets money as the case progresses. And that's not even considering Hollywood money... Hey, it's a free and capitalistic country, and there might even be a profit motive in paying the family, to provide for CR's defense.
Good point on publicity. Who ever heard of Barry Scheck before OJ?This is a high profile case that will bring this legal team more publicity than they could ever buy. It will give them professional prestige and bragging rights, no matter the verdict (though how they get there will matter). Up thread, it was pointed out that there was a large, resident Latino population in their home base area. This one case will provide them with a lifetime of Latino clients, and likely farm produce. As a husband/wife team, they can better afford to take this case on as a reduced fee or even pro bono case. Taking this case is simply good business, money is green, and practice building is hard.
"Early to bed, early to rise, work like hell and advertise." B.J. Palmer, Davenport, IA
I still think that you, and others, are seriously underestimating the amount of available money and wealth in the Latino community, and that the family may well be paying to bring this legal team on board. But I will not argue that there are Human/Civil/Immigrant Rights groups that could come forward with deep pockets money as the case progresses. And that's not even considering Hollywood money... Hey, it's a free and capitalistic country, and there might even be a profit motive in paying the family, to provide for CR's defense.
But it's also frequently been used in this forum as an abbreviation for press conference, which could lead to some confusion.
Adding, yesterday I went to the funeral of a friend's father at a Presbyterian church. At the dinner following the service I noticed that the plates had a "PC" monogram along the rim. I meant to ask somebody if they were custom ordered that way or if they picked them up at Perry Como's estate sale.
So PC could be a lot of things, you just have to look for the context.
I don't know about others but I'm getting confused about the abduction site vs a potential homicide site that isn't the cornfield. Are their two places on 385 that are in question and does anyone know what intersection he's talking about when he 'came to', before going to the cornfield?
Thank you! I missed this somewhere along the way.
LE has only said that she was abducted on 385 in rural Poweshiek county. We've been trying to determine where on that road; some say closer to town near Boundary and Middle St., which is right at the western intersection with 385, and some say it's 385 and 200, which is where the northern red dot on LE's map was located. We've mostly all been in agreement that something of significance happened in that location. JMO, that was where she was abducted and put into the trunk.I don't know about others but I'm getting confused about the abduction site vs a potential homicide site that isn't the cornfield. Are their two places on 385 that are in question and does anyone know what intersection he's talking about when he 'came to', before going to the cornfield?
And there are fewer and fewer houses the closer you get to 200.Exactly! And I wish the Google car would go all the way out to 200, but it doesn’t. It stops at 185, BUT...you can look down 385 and see that there are small hills in 385 and a small hill is enough to completely block any houses or eyes from any horrible activity going on there.
Edit 220 changed to 200
I too was very confused by poster citing 1900 385th St as the site of the homicide as fact, which I don't think is correct. LE gave us Boundary, Middle, and 1900 385th block as the Streets/area for the abduction. I believe one of these streets specifically has the Malibu making multiple passes since there's only one camera (from my understanding that we know of (?))... MOOI don't know about others but I'm getting confused about the abduction site vs a potential homicide site that isn't the cornfield. Are their two places on 385 that are in question and does anyone know what intersection he's talking about when he 'came to', before going to the cornfield?
Did CR enter a plea at the bond hearing? Was that also his arraignment?
LE has only said that she was abducted on 385 in rural Poweshiek county. We've been trying to determine where on that road; some say closer to town near Boundary and Middle St., which is right at the western intersection with 385, and some say it's 385 and 200, which is where the northern red dot on LE's map was located. We've mostly all been in agreement that something of significance happened in that location. JMO, that was where she was abducted and put into the trunk.
I'm not sure what intersection CR was at where he did a U-turn and drove to the cornfield pulloff. But the cornfield is at the intersection of 460 and hwy 21.
Oh, there will be evidence in that trunk. I watch Forensic Files, and there is always evidence! I'm being a bit funny with that comment, but also serious. My hunch is there will be evidence of Mollie in the trunk, and there will be evidence of the trunk on Mollie (like a fiber from the trunk interior).IMHO I think it would be very difficult to completely remove all trace evidence from the trunk, especially trace blood evidence that can be seen only with use of CSI techniques. Ever try and totally clean a liquid spill in your trunk lol? I have and really hard! He could not get it professionally done for obvious reasons so i think there will be trace evidence found. here's hoping! MOO
What Advantage Is There to Waiving a Preliminary Hearing?
What Advantage Is There to Waiving a Preliminary Hearing? :: Los Angeles, County Crime Lawyer Greg Hill & Associates
I'm not sure it was ever made clear, but my impression was he was already down near the cornfield. With his story, though, you never know!Maybe he did the u-turn on in the 1900 block of 385?
PLEASE tell me than an innocent 3 year old child is NOT considered anything but a victim here! [bbm]I totally agree.
@Charliegizmo49 said: ↑
That baby may also be considered a victim here.
PLEASE tell me than an innocent 3 year old child is NOT considered anything but a victim here! [bbm]