girlhasnoname
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 9,652
- Reaction score
- 122,461
ITA, this scum ball will die behind prison bars I have no doubt.Yep Defense spin/noise. I'm not worried about this case at all. IMO
ITA, this scum ball will die behind prison bars I have no doubt.Yep Defense spin/noise. I'm not worried about this case at all. IMO
I’m not the least bit worried either. Even if the defense is ultimately able to get some evidence excluded, there is still plenty there in which to convict him.ITA, this scum ball will die behind prison bars I have no doubt.
Me either. Defense is just doing what they do. Try to get evidence thrown out and create doubt. Gosh if any one of us had our vehicles forensically searched lord knows what would be found that would not even be connected to us. Smoke and mirrors.I’m not the least bit worried either. Even if the defense is ultimately able to get some evidence excluded, there is still plenty there in which to convict him.
There are some cases where I have a level of concern, but this isn’t one of them.
What does it matter IF Mollie's boyfriend had an online relationship or not? They were very young. They were doing what most college aged young lovers do, nothing more, nothing less.And then this, below. The relationship between Mollie and Jack was reported by the media as if it were a perfect love match made in heaven. Just an example that everything is not always as it appears....
BBM
“In the motion, Rivera’s attorneys write that Jack failed a lie-detector test on July 27, 2018, shortly after Tibbetts went missing. The motion states that Jack lied about an online relationship he had with a woman that Tibbetts found out about because it was “extremely embarrassing,” he wasn’t sure if it mattered, and Jack told authorities “I thought I would put it in your minds that she run away.”...”
Mollie Tibbetts murder suspect seeks delay in trial
July 24, 2018 -
Dalton Jack has been sending text messages to his girlfriend Mollie Tibbetts for six days.
He tells her he misses her.
He loves her.
He wants her to come home.
Tibbetts, 20, has been missing since last Wednesday. She hasn't answered.
"I still call her every day, too, hoping by some weird chance she will pick up," said Jack, 20. "It just goes straight to voicemail. The phone is dead."
On Tuesday, Jack said he is still hoping that she will come home to him in Brooklyn, the small farming community that watched the two sweethearts blossom for the past three years...”.
Mollie Tibbetts' boyfriend talks about the last message he received from the now-missing 20-year-old
I agree that fingerprints and even blood found in the trunk could be completely unrelated. However, if two different blood samples were intermingled in the trunk, as if they had mixed together while wet, and neither belonged to CR, than that is significant, IMO.Me either. Defense is just doing what they do. Try to get evidence thrown out and create doubt. Gosh if any one of us had our vehicles forensically searched lord knows what would be found that would not even be connected to us. Smoke and mirrors.
Here’s the kicker! The cop forgot to turn on his camera while CR allegedly led the cops to her body, and they only turned it on once they were AT the cornfield. So I’m not even sure if there’s solid evidence that he led them to her body.
Thank You.Already said and done!
The suppression hearing was held and decided by the Judge in December -- all that stuff is over.
Now it's about new blood evidence revealed in January 2020, and the tired argument of CR's civil rights violated because of his poor and/or limited Mexican education.
And then this, below. The relationship between Mollie and Jack was reported by the media as if it were a perfect love match made in heaven. Just an example that everything is not always as it appears....
BBM
“In the motion, Rivera’s attorneys write that Jack failed a lie-detector test on July 27, 2018, shortly after Tibbetts went missing. The motion states that Jack lied about an online relationship he had with a woman that Tibbetts found out about because it was “extremely embarrassing,” he wasn’t sure if it mattered, and Jack told authorities “I thought I would put it in your minds that she run away.”...”
Mollie Tibbetts murder suspect seeks delay in trial
What does it matter IF Mollie's boyfriend had an online relationship or not? They were very young. They were doing what most college aged young lovers do, nothing more, nothing less.
Jack's online flirting has ZERO to do with Bahera's brutal murder of Mollie. Smoke and mirrors.
Yes, that was a pathetic attempt to make something out of totally nothing. Whose college boyfriend isn't talking to other girl's online?CR's defense bringing up this allegation about MT's boyfriend Dalton is the most desperate and maligning motion that I've seen to date. The polygraph deception over one question was not only immediately cleared up but both MT's boyfriend and her brothers were all publically cleared by LE before the end of July 2018.
“The brothers are not suspects,” Kriegel said.
As for the boyfriend, he added, “We have confirmed [his alibi]. He is not a suspect.”
https://nypost.com/2018/07/26/missing-college-students-brothers-boyfriend-cleared-of-suspicion/
Yes, that was a pathetic attempt to make something out of totally nothing. Whose college boyfriend isn't talking to other girl's online?
It has nothing to do with a stalker/predator attacking Mollie while she was out jogging.
And when I read about the other blood in the trunk, it doesn't make me think of a different perpetrator other than Bahera.
It makes me wonder if he has more victims that we don't know about yet. Any other missing women in that area?
US lawyer calls client a ‘terrible criminal’ who deserves jailI think I can count on one hand the number of criminal defense attorneys and/or prosecutors that I did not respect at trial and CRs attorneys (Chad Frese and Jennifer Frese) are two of them. Having read Mr. Frese's own comments about the allegations against CR before deciding to join his wife to represent him make all these motions so disingenuous. MOO
Yes, and the vehicle didn't belong to him, it was shared by people working on the same farm as him. So many people used it all the time. IIRC there were over a dozen workers living on the farm and sharing the car.Me either. Defense is just doing what they do. Try to get evidence thrown out and create doubt. Gosh if any one of us had our vehicles forensically searched lord knows what would be found that would not even be connected to us. Smoke and mirrors.
I'd like to understand this portion of their Argument to the Supreme Court:
"Upon (law enforcement's) arrival, Bahena was essentially faced with two options: attempt to evade, which will certainly fail; or cooperate and hope for no consequences. Both of which were hopeless endeavors," the defense wrote in their Supreme Court request. "Bahena had no choice but to submit to the authority of the agents.”
Mollie Tibbetts case: Unidentified fingerprints, blood found in Cristhian Bahena Rivera's trunk, records show
So what is their point? The police come to pick him up for an interview, after they found video of HIS vehicle circling the block, where Mollie was last seen jogging. So they came to speak with him about that.
And these attorneys are complaining because the suspect felt he had no choice but to run away or agree to an interview?
It sounds to me like the investigators were just doing their job. A college student was MISSING. They were looking for her. Are these attorneys faulting them for wanting to interview the driver of the vehicle seen following her right before she went missing?