Now a law question. I know the defense seems like their arguments are reaching and haphazard, but maybe they are going somewhere with it all, in a way we can't see right now. But if, in the end, there is no cohesive reasoning, could there be a legal argument that he didn't receive proper representation? Could he get off on something like that?
I think even if they don't go anywhere with what they have done so far, they have really represented him well. I think if they have evidence that supports his innocence and they don't use it, then that would be a reason to appeal. I think he confessed and took them to her body, it's very hard to make magic out of that scenario for anyone! They did try to get that thrown out due to the line being left out of reading him his rights. I think they have done what they can so far with what they have. If there was something they didn't use that could help him, that would be different. Seems they are using everything, including casting doubt on the boyfriend who wasn't even within a couple hours of her when it happened.