There likely were multiple prints, but the only print relevant to the PCA is the one that backs up D's testimony that he walked right past her door. Full stop. PCA's don't usually throw in all the evidence, just what is deemed needed to get an arrest. Which is as it should be. The rest of the evidence comes out during discovery (and all of the evidence already collected must now be given to Ms Taylor and her team, and the defendant gets to see it all too). Little by little, drop by drop.
In this case, I think Ms Taylor is just going to be shaking her head in disbelief as it all comes in. She did not play the "supporting attorney" role in court during his appearance and in fact, stands up and turns her back to him while a man (an officer? another attorney?) steps in between them and the guards walk BK out of the room. There's a man in a business suit, I believe, in between Ms Taylor and her client. She is not doing the "I'm a woman and I think he's harmless" thing in court. I like her.
I believe it says the footprint was outside D's door.
From the PCA
//The detected shoe print showed a diamond-shaped pattern (similar to the pattem of a Vans type shoe sole) just outside the door of D.M.'s bedroom (located on second floor ). This is consistent with D.M.'s statement regarding the suspect's path of travel//. Emphasis mine.
And note that it doesn't say "outside her door" but "just outside" her door. The common meaning of that phrase is "very near D's door," which is why it is in the section corroborating her memory and her experience.