I think a lot of people are quick to jump on the misreporting because there's been a lot of that going around, with media just blatantly misreporting what's in the PCA. And then it snowballs into a game of telephone wherein people run with a false narrative, so in that sense, I do think--and I suspect a lot of others do--that correcting those factual errors when they happen is important to discussing the case factually.
But more specific to the case, I think one of the reasons it's important is because of the reaction of the witness. According to the PCA, the mask covered his nose and mouth, and I do suspect that could be one of the reasons why she was weirded out and quickly locked the door but didn't immediately report it. Per her description, it could be any number of masks that someone wears, like a covid face mask or even a winter weather mask, and it doesn't automatically compute as nefarious (even if it is weird in context) like, say, a ski mask. An unannounced guy in your house that sees a lot of traffic in the middle of the night sporting a covid mask or a winter mask might just be someone's guest. That same unannounced guy in a ski mask in the middle of the night has a very different vibe that just sort of cries out "Up to no good." MOO