FruitTingles
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,918
- Reaction score
- 4,712
Bingo. IMOMOO of course but the insistence of law enforcement that there’s no further threat leads me to believe the perpetrator is among the deceased.
Bingo. IMOMOO of course but the insistence of law enforcement that there’s no further threat leads me to believe the perpetrator is among the deceased.
Targeted or not, ANYONE who can murder four people is a threat to the public.From NYTIMES reporter: not a murder-suicide
Cops are saying little, but the county coroner told me it was *not* a murder-suicide. All four appear to have been friends.
So….targeted attack? Because no threat to public?
So sorry.Oh my god I cant believe this. Two of these girls are friends with my little brother.
Absolutely agree. Especially when on the run.Targeted or not, ANYONE who can murder four people is a threat to the public.
Interestingly enough, several hours after the bodies were found on Sunday, the university send out a shelter in place alert. They called it off after 40 minutes. I wonder why they initially requested shelter in place, only to call it off so quickly? It seems they did think, at least temporarily, that there was a threat to the public.From NYTIMES reporter: not a murder-suicide
Cops are saying little, but the county coroner told me it was *not* a murder-suicide. All four appear to have been friends.
So….targeted attack? Because no threat to public?
From your link:From NYTIMES reporter: not a murder-suicide
Cops are saying little, but the county coroner told me it was *not* a murder-suicide. All four appear to have been friends.
So….targeted attack? Because no threat to public?
From NYTIMES reporter: not a murder-suicide
Cops are saying little, but the county coroner told me it was *not* a murder-suicide. All four appear to have been friends.
So….targeted attack? Because no threat to public?
Same. Which makes me confused that they’re holding the line that there’s no danger to the public.Interesting. My thought was that they know who did it, but haven't made an arrest yet, but from the line about the burglary it makes me think I'm wrong.
This, or that the most likely perpetrator is in the hospital and the hospital is not authorized to release that information yet.MOO of course but the insistence of law enforcement that there’s no further threat leads me to believe the perpetrator is among the deceased.
Again I say, MOO, that anyone who kills four people is a danger to the community no matter why they did it. Even if it was incredibly targeted, someone who would do something like that cannot be trusted to not hurt someone else.It sounds like it was targeted and very specific to these victims, that LE knows why they were killed and who killed them. That makes more sense to me that they would say no danger to the community.
Did they say they have no suspect, or that they have no suspect in custody?
No one is in custody per this article LinkThis, or that the most likely perpetrator is in the hospital and the hospital is not authorized to release that information yet.