indicolite22
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
- Messages
- 10,312
- Reaction score
- 86,128
Scott Reisch’s Further Analysis Of The Vallow-Daybell Hearings
That should be 1 PM MT, @Niner.![]()
MTW2011 said:Court has heard all the arguments and wants to give time to counsel to prepare final arguments, and would like to conclude the hearing this Friday at 3pm
My two cents. I feel Woods was totally out of line. He knew what he was doing during that 18 minute dissertation. Shame on him. I believe the judge should remove him now - no need to go through a trial with him, just to have a mis-trial called for later.
3pm Eastern time zone // 1pm MT, sorry ‘bout thatThis is where I got the time... so figured it was MT.
??
3pm Eastern time zone // 1pm MT, sorry ‘bout that
Well, “who says” is the court hearing notice that says the hearing is at 1pm today. I wasn’t able to edit the original to add the time zonewho says?
too late to change it anyway... corrected my notes though! Thanks!![]()
Well, “who says” is the court hearing notice that says the hearing is at 1pm today. I wasn’t able to edit the original to add the time zone
https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/case/CR22-20-838/Notice of Remote Hearing 010721.pdf
And I meant I couldn’t change it in my post to add the time zone. Lol, sorry we both misunderstood one another on. Back to your regularly scheduled programming now....Okay - but as I said can't change it on my post. I can't access ID court sites.
And I meant I couldn’t change it in my post to add the time zone. Lol, sorry we both misunderstood one another on. Back to your regularly scheduled programming now....
My two cents. I feel Woods was totally out of line. He knew what he was doing during that 18 minute dissertation. Shame on him. I believe the judge should remove him now - no need to go through a trial with him, just to have a mis-trial called for later.
As I listened to the audio, I admit it was cringe worthy at moments. I like you, am concerned about the possibility of a mistrial. I am not a legal expert so I am unsure if there are in fact potential consequences to this type of questioning/leading by a prosecutor, but I wonder how different is this to LE questioning possible suspects? I have seen taped interrogations....some are pretty combative. I have also seen witnesses questioned quite aggressively at depositions by attorneys...
I wonder if any of the WS legal experts can tell me: what makes one type of questioning acceptable and another unacceptable? Is it mere common sense? Or is it matters of law and order?