pizzaman12
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2019
- Messages
- 1,780
- Reaction score
- 14,359
Whether or not she would have been entitled to half under community property laws, she would have been denied it based on the "Slayer Rule" laws which do not permit a person to profit from their own participation in murder of the insured.
She had zero to do with it from a legal standpoint. Her nor AC were charged with anything. There is no basis for the slayer rule