In my professional capacity I am fortunate enough to have the opportunity, among other things, to teach a Victim Empathy for Offenders class to offenders on supervised community release (i.e. probation and/or parole). Setting aside the Anthonys perception of the factual basis of this case -- and I will say that, based on the information released to the public so far, I think Casey was likely responsible for Caylee's death -- I think it is important to remember, foremost, that Caylee is the victim here, and George and Cindy Anthony are tertiary victims. I can't even begin to imagine their grief and pain. Working with victims of crime is, yes, rewarding, but it's also emotionally
exhausting -- there is oftentimes vicarious trauma suffered by those who work
with victims of crime. I can only imagine how absolutely devastating it must be to actually be the victim, to have inside you that horrific, soul-sucking blackness of loss, anger, grief and rage that comes with losing a precious loved one to homicide. My nephew, my sister's only child, was tragically killed in 1996 in a case that resulted in a criminally negligent homicide conviction for the offender, an offender who was as egregiously non-remorseful and unsympathetic as Casey Anthony herself presents. I can't even begin to describe or know my sister's pain -- it was seriously
relentless, God, for at least five years. At
least. And, for what it's worth, my nephew's case received media coverage, including from
Dateline NBC.
As victims, which I do believe George and Cindy are, I would like to suggest -- and just consider it! -- that our expectations of
how Cindy and George
should answer many of the (very legitimate!) questions above are inappropriate. By inappropriate, what I'm saying is that our expectations of how a victim of crime can or should process and/or communicate direct questions regarding the crime can be inadvertently cruel and unreasonable, especially this soon after the crime has occurred, and is tainted by coming from our own frame of reference as non-victims (or, not being recent victims) and as outsiders looking in.
Working with victims of crime is difficult. It will be many, many,
many years before the Anthony family processes this hideous and heartbreaking crime. It will never resolve for them, not fully. Caylee's loss will never be mitigated for them. There is a tendency sometimes to default to enjoying a healthy dose of
schadenfreude when observing victims of crime who present as unsympathetic. I logically understand this -- trust me, I've had my moments, too. There is the tendency to view parents whose children commit criminal offenses as heinous, monstrous individuals who deserve the pain that their child's crime brings. Yes, certainly parenting impacts who our child becomes and, to some extent, what choices they ultimately make. Yet, I'm totally willing to say that the average parents' goal for their children is
not for a child to become criminally oriented. The average parent never imagines that their child would grow up to kill someone. I could go on and on, but I do believe, generally, that many parenting decisions are made out of love and protection,
even if those decisions appear inexplicable, obviously wrong and tragically enabling to everyone else. One thing that struck me, when reading the e-mails released that were between Cindy's family members, was that at least one family member stated about Casey, "Wow, she sure didn't turn out like we thought she would" or something to that extent. That suggests that Casey at one point was thought to have a perfectly normal and potentially successful future ahead of her.
So, what would I ask Cindy? Well, first, I would tell her something: I am so very sorry that this has happened. I am so sorry that Caylee has been killed. Because, I am. All of us are, yes? I would ask her if she needed to talk -- about anything, any topic. I would ask her what I could do to help her and George. I would ask her if she wanted to talk about Caylee or Casey, and not necessarily mean about Caylee's death and Casey's arrest for murder. I would refrain from offering advice, telling her "I know how you feel" (because, I don't), or insisting that she concede any points about anything in the case. I would just listen.
Again, I recognize why people are incensed by the Anthonys. I do. I'm not suggesting that it's a wrong reaction or point of view. The evidence we have heard so far against Casey is very compelling.
But, you know, coincidentally, I was working for Boulder Probation Department at the Boulder Justice Center at the time JonBenet Ramsey was murdered -- that was twelve years ago. And it was just this year that the DA's office exonerated John and Patsy Ramsey -- there was some pretty compelling evidence in JonBenet's case, too, that warranted investigating JonBenet's parents for involvement in her murder. The Ramseys were
villified locally, for years and years, and we all know JonBenet's murder has been fodder for the tabloids since she was killed. Patsy Ramsey in particular was practically crucified for involving JonBenet in pagents, etc, which was ultimately a judgment on her parenting. The Ramseys exercised their legal rights in retaining counsel, and in doing so the American public took this as proof of their guilt. Peter Boyles, our local talk radio JonBenet pundit, excoriated the Ramseys for
years, with his favorite tag line being "It's not how
true victim parents react." We're learning more and more that sometimes things happen outside the box, and it's hard to roll with the punches when that happens. IMO anyway.
Now, if this thread were entitled "If You Were a Mind Reader and It Was Impossible for Cindy and George Anthony to Resist Your Amazing Power, What Would You Ask Them?" my answer would be a whooooooole lot different! :whistle: