Thank you so much for sharing, UnlicensedPI!
Ms. Warsmith is indeed the reporter I have been in touch with. She did a great job of telling Mr. Rogers’ life story, as well as investigating what may have caused a delay in the identification of the remains, IMO.
I find the following portion of the article particularly interesting (and also somewhat discouraging, or even troubling, IMO):
“A passer-by noticed a body floating in Lake Michigan off East Ohio Street in Chicago on July 10, 2015.
[SBM]
Investigators later told family members the body had been in the water for several months,
which made the man’s facial features impossible to distinguish.
This contributed to an error that may have delayed the identification of the remains.
An anthropologist who examined the body thought the deceased man was either white or Asian, which turned out to be wrong. (Michael Rogers was African-American.) The incorrect racial information was included in the remains’ description and used for a drawing of the man.
‘It was anthropological exam,’ said Natalia Derevyanny, a spokeswoman for Cook County. ‘
The features of one race or ethnicity can be similar to the features of another race or ethnicity.’
The coroner entered the information on the remains and submitted the man’s DNA to the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs), but got no matches with known missing persons.
The case, though, wasn’t forgotten.
[SBM]
The Ohio Center for Missing Persons featured the case on its Facebook page in November 2018. The post drew a great deal of interest.“
Here is a link to the FB post that’s being referred to:
Ohio Center For Missing Persons
There are a couple of very interesting comments by KR (or KRO) from six weeks ago, or on Nov. 21st to be exact. They are found under a comment JS made eight weeks ago, or on Nov. 8th. The second comment KR posted in brought tears to my eyes. If it weren’t for all the shares on FB, it would have taken even longer for Mr. Rogers’ remains to be identified, IMO.
There are a couple of things I find almost disturbing with regard to the investigation: If it was “impossible” in their opinion to discern the decedent’s facial features, what was the sketch based on? Also, according to the article, there was a DNA test performed. Wouldn’t the results show that the man was indeed of African-American descent?